...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical cardiology. >Management of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation or Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes in Cardiac Rehabilitation Centers
【24h】

Management of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation or Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes in Cardiac Rehabilitation Centers

机译:心脏康复中心治疗ST段抬高或非ST段抬高的急性冠状动脉综合征

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACTBackgroundCurrent data on the management of patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after an acute hospital stay due to ST-segment elevation or non–ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS) are limited. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, risk factor management, and lipid target achievement of patients in CR in Germany and compare the 2 groups.HypothesisWith respect to the risk factor pattern and treatment effects during a CR stay, there are important differences between STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS patients.MethodsComparison of 7950 patients by STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS status in the Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management registry (2010) who underwent an inpatient CR period of about 3 weeks.ResultsSTE-ACS patients compared to NSTE-ACS patients were significantly younger (60.5 vs 64.4 years, P 0.0001), and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or any risk factor (exception: smoking) less often. At discharge, in STE-ACS compared to NSTE-ACS patients, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 100 mg/dL goal was achieved by 75.3% and 76.2%, respectively (LDL-C 70 mg/dL by 27.7% and 27.4%), the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal of 50 mg/dL in women and 40 mg/dL in men was achieved by 49.3% and 49.0%, respectively, and the triglycerides goal of 150 mg/dl was achievedby 72.3% and 74.3%, respectively (all comparisons not significant). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 121/74 and 123/74 mm Hg, respectively (P 0.0001 systolic, diastolic not significant). The maximum exercise capacity was 110 and 102 W, respectively (P 0.0001), and the maximum walking distance was 581 and 451 meters, respectively (P value not significant).ConclusionsPatients with STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS differed moderately in their baseline characteristics. Both groups benefited from the participation in CR, as their lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness improved.
机译:摘要背景由于ST段抬高或非ST段抬高引起的急性冠脉综合征(STE-ACS或NSTE-ACS)导致的急性住院后心脏康复(CR)患者管理的当前数据有限。我们旨在描述德国CR的患者特征,危险因素管理和血脂目标达成情况,并比较两组。假设关于CR住院期间的危险因素模式和治疗效果,STE-ACS之间存在重要差异方法比较透明注册系统中7950例患者的STE-ACS或NSTE-ACS身份以客观指导方针的风险因素管理注册系统(2010年)的住院时间约3周,以比较其客观性。与NSTE-ACS相比,患者年轻得多(60.5岁对64.4岁,P <0.0001),并且患糖尿病,高血压或任何危险因素(吸烟除外)的频率降低。出院时,与NSTE-ACS患者相比,STE-ACS中的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<100 mg / dL目标分别达到了75.3%和76.2%(LDL-C <70 mg / dL分别将女性达到> 50 mg / dL和男性> 40 mg / dL的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标分别提高了49.3%和49.0%,并将甘油三酯目标<150 mg / dl分别达到72.3%和74.3%(所有比较都不显着)。平均收缩压和舒张压分别为121/74和123/74 mm Hg(P <0.0001收缩压,舒张压不显着)。最大运动能力分别为110 W和102 W(P <0.0001),最大步行距离分别为581米和451米(P值不显着)。结论STE-ACS和NSTE-ACS的患者基线水平存在中等差异特征。两组患者都受益于参与CR,因为他们的血脂,血压和身体素质得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号