...
首页> 外文期刊>Chronic respiratory disease. >Patient agenda setting in respiratory outpatients: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Patient agenda setting in respiratory outpatients: A randomized controlled trial

机译:呼吸门诊患者的议程设置:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Soliciting a patient’s agenda (the reason for their visit, concerns and expectations) is fundamental to health care but if not done effectively outcomes can be adversely affected. Forms to help patients consider important issues prior to a consultation have been tested with mixed results. We hypothesized that using an agenda form would impact the extent to which patients felt their doctor discussed the issues that were important to them. Patients were randomized to receive an agenda form to complete whilst waiting or usual care. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients agreeing with the statement ‘My doctor discussed the issues that were important to me’ rated on a four-point scale. Secondary outcomes included other experience and satisfaction measures, consultation duration and patient confidence. There was no significant effect of agenda form use on primary or secondary outcomes. Post hoc exploratory analyses suggested possible differential effects for new compared to follow-up patients. There was no overall benefit from the form and a risk of detrimental impact on patient experience for some patients. There is a need for greater understanding of what works for whom in supporting patients to get the most from their consultation.
机译:提出患者的议程(拜访的原因,关注和期望的原因)是医疗保健的基础,但如果未有效执行,则结果可能受到不利影响。帮助患者在咨询之前考虑重要问题的表格已经过测试,结果不一。我们假设使用议程表会影响患者认为医生讨论了对他们重要的问题的程度。患者被随机分配接受议程表,以在等待或常规护理时完成。主要结果指标是接受“我的医生讨论了对我来说很重要的问题”陈述的患者所占的比例,该得分为四分制。次要结果包括其他经验和满意度指标,咨询时间和患者信心。议程形式的使用对主要或次要结果没有显着影响。事后探索性分析表明,与随访患者相比,新患者可能产生不同的影响。这种形式并没有给患者带来整体益处,并且对某些患者而言,存在对患者体验产生不利影响的风险。需要更好地了解谁为谁服务,以帮助患者从他们的咨询中获得最大收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号