The aim of this study was to compare a commercial ELISA kit for detection on coproantigen examination and fecal sedimentation using as gold sta'/> Commercial ELISA? kit for detection of coproantigen and coproparasitological method in bovine livers with fascioliasis convicted
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia Rural >Commercial ELISA? kit for detection of coproantigen and coproparasitological method in bovine livers with fascioliasis convicted
【24h】

Commercial ELISA? kit for detection of coproantigen and coproparasitological method in bovine livers with fascioliasis convicted

机译:商业ELISA?判定患有筋膜炎的牛肝中原抗原和原寄生虫学检测试剂盒

获取原文
           

摘要

> face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The aim of this study was to compare a commercial ELISA kit for detection on coproantigen examination and fecal sedimentation using as gold standard inspection diagnosis of bovine livers at slaughter. In addition, we evaluated the correlation between the measured intensity of infection by counting eggs in the feces and the parasites in bovine livers. Feces were collected and evaluated macroscopically of 81 cattle livers, 45 of which had livers condemned by liver flukes and in these livers parasites were counted. Two fractions of stool samples collected were separated and one stored in freezer for further ELISA and other one processed according to sedimentation technique for diagnosis Fasciola hepatica. The Spearman correlation and McNemar chi-square were used, adopting the significance of 5%. In eight bovine livers condemned by the characteristic lesions of fascioliasis parasite were not found. The stool examinations and ELISA testing for detection coproantigen, respectively, had sensitivity of 51.11% and 75.55%, specificity of 100% and 91,66%, predictive positive value was 100% and 91.89%, predictive negative value 62% and 75% and kappa 0.48 and 0.65. The results obtained by commercial® ELISA kit did not differ (P=0,06) obtained at slaughterhouse, but the stool examinations differed (P0.0001) in the detection of the positive animals. The correlation between the number of parasites in the liver and the number of eggs in the feces was moderate (rs=0.5757, P0.0001). The commercial ELISA kit® was more sensitive than the fecal test, althought this one shoud not be discarded because of their efficiency.
机译:> face =“ Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif” size =“ 2”>本研究的目的是比较商业ELISA试剂盒,用于检测协原抗原和粪便沉淀,作为金标准检验诊断宰杀牛肝。此外,我们通过计算粪便中的卵与牛肝中的寄生虫之间的相关性来评估所测得的感染强度。收集粪便并进行宏观评估,评估了81个牛肝,其中有45个牛肝被肝吸虫定罪,并在这些肝中计数了寄生虫。收集的粪便样本分为两部分,一份保存在冰箱中以进行进一步的ELISA,另一份则根据沉淀技术进行处理,以诊断 肝炎筋膜炎 。使用Spearman相关和McNemar卡方,显着性为5%。在八只因筋膜寄生虫特征性病变而受到谴责的牛肝中,没有发现。粪便检查和ELISA测试检测原抗原的敏感性分别为51.11%和75.55%,特异性为100%和91.66%,预测阳性值为100%和91.89%,预测阴性值为62%和75%, κ0.48和0.65。商业ELISA试剂盒获得的结果与屠宰场的结果没有差异(P = 0.06),但粪便检查在阳性动物的检测方面有所差异(P <0.0001)。肝脏中的寄生虫数量与粪便中的卵数量之间的相关性中等(rs = 0.5757,P <0.0001)。商用ELISA试剂盒®比粪便检测法更灵敏,尽管由于效率高而不能将其丢弃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号