首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia Rural >Harvest header and manual harvest with mechanical strip on rice ( Oryza sativa, L. ) seeds quality
【24h】

Harvest header and manual harvest with mechanical strip on rice ( Oryza sativa, L. ) seeds quality

机译:收割割台和机械收割的水稻(Oryza sativa,L.)种子质量的手动收割

获取原文
           

摘要

During irrigated rice harvesting occur losses and physical and phisiological seed damage. Late 80's, appeared the strippers headers that strip the grain, instead of cutting the spike. However, little is know about physical and phisiological seed damage by harvest header. The objective of this work was to evaluate the mechanical damage caused to BR-IRGA 409 and BR-IRGA 410 rice cultivars by three harvesting methods: (a) manual harvesting and mechanical strip; (b) cutterbar harvesting and; (c) stripper header harvesting. Samples were collected directly in the grain tank when the harvest was mechanical. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications. Results demonstrated that the rice seeds of the studied variety didn't showed significant differences in physical and phisiological in seed quality when harvested by cutterbar or stripper header. These two harvesting forms, however, showed significantly seed damages when compared to manual harvesting and mechanical strip.
机译:在灌溉水稻期间,会发生损失以及物理和生理种子的损失。 80年代后期,出现了剥皮机的割台,该割台对谷物进行剥皮,而不是切掉穗。但是,对于收获标头对物理和生理种子的损害知之甚少。这项工作的目的是通过三种收获方法评估对BR-IRGA 409和BR-IRGA 410水稻品种造成的机械损害:(a)手动收获和机械剥皮; (b)割草机的收获;以及(c)汽提塔割台的收获。机械收割时,将样品直接收集在谷物罐中。实验设计是具有六个重复的随机区组。结果表明,当用割草机或刮毛器割台收获时,所研究品种的水稻种子在物理和生理上的种子品质没有显着差异。但是,与手动收获和机械剥离相比,这两种收获形式均显示出明显的种子损坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号