首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >The Nordic maintenance care program: what are the indications for maintenance care in patients with low back pain? A survey of the members of the Danish Chiropractors' Association
【24h】

The Nordic maintenance care program: what are the indications for maintenance care in patients with low back pain? A survey of the members of the Danish Chiropractors' Association

机译:北欧保养护理计划:下腰痛患者的保养护理有哪些适应症?丹麦脊医协会成员的调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Maintenance care (MC) is relatively commonly used among chiropractors. However, factual information is needed on its indications for use. Objectives This study had two objectives: 1) to describe which role patients' past history and treatment outcome play in chiropractors' decision to use MC in patients with low back pain, 2) to investigate if the chiropractors' clinical/educational background has an effect on the frequency of using MC and their indications for use of MC. Method An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 413 chiropractors practising in Denmark. Its main part consisted of 3 sets of 4 questions relating to one basic case of low back pain. For each case, the chiropractors were asked if they would use MC as they self-defined the term (no/perhaps/yes). There were questions also on gender, age, educational and clinical background, and on the number of MC patients seen by these chiropractors. Their decision to recommend MC was reported. Associations between the demographic variables and 1) the frequency of MC-use and 2) their indications for use of MC were tested through multivariate analysis. Results The response rate was 72%. Non-indications for MC were: 1) a good outcome combined with no previous events, or 2) a past history of LBP and gradual worsening with treatment. Indications for MC were a good outcome combined with a previous history of low back pain between once a month and once a year. The mean proportion of MC patients per week were 22% (SD 19), ranging from 0% to 100%. The use of MC was highest among experienced chiropractors, those who were educated in North America, and clinic owners. However, in Denmark most chiropractors graduated before 1999, are educated abroad, whereas most chiropractors thereafter are educated in Denmark. Therefore, we cannot conclude whether this difference relates to education or years of experience. There were no associations detected between demographic variables and the indications for MC. Conclusions There is relatively high consensus on when MC should and should not be used. A history of prior low back pain combined with a positive response to treatment encourages the use of MC, whereas no previous history of back pain or a worsening of symptoms discourages the use of MC. There seems to be a difference in the proportional use of MC between chiropractors with more experience educated in North America and those with less experience educated in Denmark.
机译:背景维护护理(MC)在脊医中相对普遍使用。但是,需要有关其使用指示的事实信息。目的这项研究有两个目的:1)描述患者的既往史和治疗结果在脊医决定使用MC治疗下背痛患者中起什么作用; 2)调查脊医的临床/教育背景是否有作用。关于使用MC的频率及其使用MC的指示。方法向丹麦的所有413名脊椎治疗师发送了匿名问卷。它的主要部分包括3组,每组4个问题,涉及一个基本的下腰痛案例。对于每种情况,都询问脊医他们是否会使用MC,因为他们自定义了该术语(否/可能/是)。还有关于性别,年龄,学历和临床背景以及这些脊医看到的MC患者数量的问题。据报道,他们决定推荐MC。通过多变量分析测试了人口统计学变量与1)MC使用频率和2)MC使用迹象之间的关联。结果回应率为72%。 MC的无适应症为:1)结局良好,无先前事件,或2)LBP既往史和治疗后逐渐恶化。 MC的指征是一个很好的结果,结合以前每月一次和每年一次的下背痛病史。每周MC患者的平均比例为22%(SD 19),范围从0%到100%。在经验丰富的脊医,在北美受过教育的脊医和诊所老板中,MC的使用率最高。但是,在丹麦,大多数脊医在1999年之前毕业,都在国外接受教育,而此后的大多数脊医在丹麦接受教育。因此,我们无法断定这种差异是否与学历或经验有关。在人口统计学变量与MC适应症之间未发现关联。结论关于何时应使用MC和不应使用MC的共识较高。既往有下腰痛的病史,加上对治疗的积极反应,因此鼓励使用MC,而以前没有背痛或症状加重的病史不妨碍使用MC。在北美受过较多教育的脊医和丹麦受过较少教育的脊医之间,按比例使用MC似乎有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号