...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >The clinical efficacy of small-window craniotomy on non-progressive trans-sinus epidural hematoma
【24h】

The clinical efficacy of small-window craniotomy on non-progressive trans-sinus epidural hematoma

机译:小窗口开颅手术治疗非进行性经窦窦硬膜外血肿的临床疗效

获取原文

摘要

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of two surgical approaches, trans-sinus small-window craniotomy (TSSWCT) and combined supratentorial-infratentorial craniotomy (CSITCT), on non-progressive trans-sinus epidural hematoma. Methods There were 67 patients with non-progressive trans-sinus epidural hematoma who underwent TSSWCT or CSITCT. The postoperative residual hematoma, postoperative alteration of intracranial pressure (ICP), recanalization of affected cerebral venous sinuses, length of hospitalization, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of patients were retrospectively compared. Results Compared with patients in the CSITCT group (N = 35), those in the TSSWCT group (N = 32) had significantly reduced postoperative residual hematoma near the venous sinus [(1.40 ± 1.60) ml vs (3.50 ± 2.10) ml, P = 0.000], length of hospitalization [(13.40 ± 5.70) d vs (17.30 ± 7.00) d, P = 0.015], markedly down-regulated levels of intracranial pressure (ICP) at indicated postoperative time points [1 d: (164.40 ± 33.30) mm H2O vs (198.60 ± 49.30) mm H2O, P = 0.002; 3 d: (185.90 ± 47.80) mm H2O vs (226.30 ± 81.60) mm H2O, P = 0.017; 7 d: (154.70 ± 52.50) mm H2O vs (198.30 ± 84.20) mm H2O, P = 0.014)], and distinctly improved recanalization of affected cerebral venous sinuses (87.50% vs 65.70% , P = 0.037). Moreover, the 6-month GOS scores were not statistically different between patients in 2 groups (Z = -0.114, P = 0.909). Conclusions Compared with CSITCT, TSSWCT is a reliable surgical approach in the treatment of non-progressive trans-sinus epidural hematoma which has strengthened capability of evacuating hematoma underlying affected venous sinuses, relieving the compressed venous sinus and attenuating the intracranial hypertension.?DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2015.02.011.
机译:目的探讨经鼻窦小窗开颅术(TSSWCT)和经上蝶窦下联合开颅术(CSITCT)两种手术方法对非进行性经鼻窦硬膜外血肿的临床疗效。方法67例非进展性经鼻窦硬膜外血肿患者行TSSWCT或CSITCT检查。回顾性比较了术后残余血肿,术后颅内压(ICP),受影响的脑静脉窦再通,住院时间和6个月格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分。结果与CSITCT组(N = 35)相比,TSSWCT组(N = 32)的患者在静脉窦附近的术​​后残余血肿明显减少[(1.40±1.60)ml vs(3.50±2.10)ml,P = 0.000],住院时间[(13.40±5.70)d vs(17.30±7.00)d,P = 0.015],在指定的术后时间点颅内压(ICP)水平显着下调[1 d:(164.40± 33.30)毫米水柱vs(198.60±49.30)毫米水柱,P = 0.002; 3天:(185.90±47.80)毫米水柱vs(226.30±81.60)毫米水柱,P = 0.017; 7 d:(154.70±52.50)mm H2O相对于(198.30±84.20)mm H2O,P = 0.014)],并且显着改善了受影响的脑静脉窦的再通(87.50%vs 65.70%,P = 0.037)。此外,两组患者之间的6个月GOS评分在统计学上没有差异(Z = -0.114,P = 0.909)。结论与CSITCT相比,TSSWCT是治疗非进行性经窦窦硬膜外血肿的可靠手术方法,可增强排空受影响静脉窦基础的血肿的能力,减轻静脉窦压力并减轻颅内高压。DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1672-6731.2015.02.011。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号