首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Analysis on the clinical characteristics and treatment of intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis
【24h】

Analysis on the clinical characteristics and treatment of intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis

机译:颅内静脉窦血栓形成的临床特点及治疗分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To explore the clinical characteristics and treatment of intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis. Methods Fourteen patients (2 males and 12 females) with intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis were divided into 2 groups, and were treated with argatroban (argatroban group, n = 8) and heparin (heparin group, n = 6), respectively. Age, pattern of onset, clinical manifestations, imaging characteristics and result of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination were analysed. The improvement of neural function and outcome was compared between 2 groups. Results Intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis could be seen in all age, but especially often occurred in young and middle?aged women. The common causes were pregnancy, infection, immunological disorders, etc. Acute or subacute clinical characteristics were headache (71.43%, 10/14), seizure (35.71%, 5/14), asthenia (21.43%, 3/14), and CSF pressure was significantly high in most patients. The imaging findings were cerebral venous and sinus occlusion and cerebral parenchymal impairment (infarction, hemorrhage, brain edema). There were 7 and 5 effective cases in argatroban group and heparin group, respectively (Z = ? 0.067, P = 0.950). In both group, the neural function [National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score] was significantly improved after treatment (P = 0.007). Conclusion Intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis should be highly suspected in patients who have no common risk factors for stroke, but with acute intracranial hypertensive symptoms such as headache, vomiting, and cortex symmetric infarction on CT scanning. Although cerebral angiography is the golden standard for the diagnosis of intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis, most patients can be early diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV). The difference in curative effect is not significant between argatroban and heparin. The patient with intracranial venous and sinus thrombosis may get more benefit, when anticoagulant therapy is given earlier and actively. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2011.02.015.
机译:目的探讨颅内静脉窦血栓形成的临床特点及治疗方法。方法将14例颅内静脉和窦血栓形成患者(男2例,女12例)分为2组,分别接受阿加曲班(argatroban组,n = 8)和肝素(肝素组,n = 6)治疗。分析了年龄,发病方式,临床表现,影像学特征和脑脊液(CSF)检查结果。比较两组之间神经功能和预后的改善情况。结果颅内静脉和窦内血栓形成在所有年龄段均可见,但尤以年轻和中年妇女常见。常见原因是怀孕,感染,免疫系统疾病等。急性或亚急性临床特征为头痛(71.43%,10/14),癫痫发作(35.71%,5/14),乏力(21.43%,3/14)和大多数患者的脑脊液压力明显较高。影像学表现为脑静脉和窦闭塞以及脑实质损害(梗塞,出血,脑水肿)。阿加曲班组和肝素组分别有7例和5例有效病例(Z = 0.067,P = 0.950)。两组患者的神经功能[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分]均在治疗后得到显着改善(P = 0.007)。结论对于没有中风常见危险因素但伴有CT扫描显示的头痛,呕吐和皮质对称性梗塞等急性颅内高压症状的患者,应高度怀疑颅内静脉和窦血栓形成。尽管脑血管造影是诊断颅内静脉和窦血栓形成的黄金标准,但大多数患者可以通过磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振静脉造影(MRV)进行早期诊断。阿加曲班和肝素的疗效差异不明显。如果尽早积极地给予抗凝治疗,颅内静脉窦血栓形成的患者可能会受益更多。 DOI:10.3969 / j.issn.1672-6731.2011.02.015。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号