首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research >A comparison of systolic blood pressure measurement obtained using a pulse oximeter, and direct systolic pressure measurement in anesthetized sows.
【24h】

A comparison of systolic blood pressure measurement obtained using a pulse oximeter, and direct systolic pressure measurement in anesthetized sows.

机译:比较使用脉搏血氧仪获得的收缩压测量值和麻醉母猪的直接收缩压测量值。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Systolic blood pressure measurement obtained with a pulse oximeter has been compared to values obtained by other indirect methods in man. Direct pressure measurement is subject to less error than indirect techniques. This study was designed to compare systolic pressure values obtained using a pulse oximeter, with values obtained by direct arterial pressure measurement. The pulse oximeter waveform was used as an indication of perfusion. A blood pressure cuff was applied proximal to the pulse oximeter probe. The cuff was inflated until the oximeter waveform disappeared, this value was recorded as the systolic pressure at the disappearance of the waveform (SPD). The cuff was inflated to a pressure > 200 mmHg, then gradually deflated until the waveform reappeared, this value was recorded as the systolic pressure at reappearance of the waveform (SPR). The average of the two values, SPD and SPR, was calculated and recorded as SPA. The study was performed in sows (n = 21) undergoing cesarean section under epidural anesthesia and IV sedation. A total of 280 measurements were made of SPD, SPR and SPA. Regression analysis of SPA and direct measurement revealed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.81. Calculation of mean difference (bias) and standard deviation of the bias (precision) for direct pressure--SPA revealed a value of 1.3 +/- 12.1. When compared with direct measurement, the correlation of this technique was similar to that recorded for other indirect techniques used in small animals. This indicates that this technique would be useful for following systolic pressure trends.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
机译:用脉搏血氧仪获得的收缩压测量值已与通过人体其他间接方法获得的值进行了比较。直接压力测量的误差要小于间接技术。本研究旨在比较使用脉搏血氧仪获得的收缩压值与通过直接动脉压测量获得的值。脉搏血氧仪波形用作灌注指示。在脉搏血氧仪探针的近端施加一个血压袖带。将袖带充气直至血氧饱和度计波形消失,该值记录为波形消失时的收缩压(SPD)。将袖带充气至> 200 mmHg的压力,然后逐渐放气直至波形再次出现,该值记录为波形再次出现时的收缩压(SPR)。计算两个值SPD和SPR的平均值,并记录为SPA。该研究是在硬膜外麻醉和静脉内镇静的情况下对剖宫产的母猪(n = 21)进行的。 SPD,SPR和SPA总共进行了280次测量。 SPA和直接测量的回归分析显示相关系数(r)为0.81。直接压力-SPA的平均差(bias)和偏差的标准偏差(precision)的计算得出-SPA值为1.3 +/- 12.1。当与直接测量相比较时,该技术的相关性类似于在小型动物中使用的其他间接技术所记录的相关性。这表明该技术对于跟踪收缩压趋势很有用。(摘要截断为250个字)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号