...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Timing of EEG for predicting the outcome in patients with massive cerebral hemispheric infarction
【24h】

Timing of EEG for predicting the outcome in patients with massive cerebral hemispheric infarction

机译:脑电图预测大面积脑半球梗死患者预后的时间

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To determine the optimal timing of electroencephalogram (EEG) in predicting the outcome in patients with massive cerebral hemispheric infarction (MCHI) by evaluating and comparing the EEG changes during different acute stages after onset. Methods A total of 72 MCHI patients were selected to be monitored by bedside EEG at two stages: 1-3 and 4-7 d after onset, respectively. The outcome after 3 months was assessed as good [Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score 3-5] or poor (GOS score 1-2). Then the predictive accuracy of EEG patterns and gradings (the Synek scale) were calculated and compared between two stages to confirm the optimal timing of prediction. Results In 72 cases, 62.50% (45/72) had good and 37.50% (27/72) had poor outcome 3 months after onset. Benign EEG patterns were protective factors for the outcome of MCHI (1-3 d: RR = 0.357, 95%CI: 0.153-0.834, Mantel-Haenszel χ2 = 6.147, P = 0.013; 4-7 d: RR = 0.240, 95%CI: 0.102-0.564, Mantel-Haenszel χ2 = 13.601, P = 0.000) and they could predict good outcome with incidence rate of 82.14% (23/28)-85.71% (30/35) and the accuracy of 62.50%-72.22% . Malignant EEG patterns at 4-7 d were risk factors for the outcome of MCHI (RR = 2.909, 95%CI: 1.611-5.253, Mantel-Haenszel χ2 = 11.110, P = 0.001), and they could predict poor outcome with incidence rate of 66.67% (16/24) and the accuracy of 73.63%. There was a significant negative correlation between the Synek scale and GOS score both during 1-3 d (rs = - 0.354, P = 0.002) and 4-7 d (rs = - 0.417, P = 0.000) after onset, indicating the higher the Synek scale was, the worse the outcome would be. The accuracy (83.33% vs 70.78%; χ2 = 4.000, P = 0.039), consistency (Kappa test: κ = 0.639, 95%CI: 0.522-0.746 vs κ = 0.406, 95%CI: 0.353-0.459; P = 0.001) and area under curves (0.86 ± 0.05, 95%CI: 0.761-0.958 vs 0.69 ± 0.07, 95%CI: 0.554-0.822; P = 0.002) of the Synek scale for prediction of long-term outcome during 4-7 d after onset were significantly higher than those during 1-3 d after onset. Conclusions EEG patterns and the Synek scale during 1-3 d after MCHI onset could be used to evaluate the severity of brain injury and to further guide medical treatment, while the Synek scale during 4-7 d after onset could be used to evaluate the long-term outcome and treatment with a high accuracy.?DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2015.12.005.
机译:目的通过评估和比较发作后不同急性期的脑电图变化,确定脑电图(EEG)预测脑部大面积脑梗死(MCHI)患者预后的最佳时机。方法选择72例MCHI患者,分别在发病后1-3天和4-7天分两个阶段进行床旁脑电图监测。 3个月后的结局被评估为好[格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)评分3-5]或差(GOS评分1-2)。然后计算脑电图模式和等级(Synek量表)的预测准确性,并在两个阶段之间进行比较以确认最佳预测时机。结果72例患者在发病3个月后的预后良好,分别为62.50%(45/72)和37.50%(27/72)。良性脑电图模式是MCHI结果的保护因素(1-3 d:RR = 0.357,95%CI:0.153-0.834,Mantel-Haenszelχ2= 6.147,P = 0.013; 4-7 d:RR = 0.240,95 %CI:0.102-0.564,Mantel-Haenszelχ2= 13.601,P = 0.000),他们可以预测良好的预后,发生率为82.14%(23/28)-85.71%(30/35),准确度为62.50%- 72.22%。 4-7 d时恶性脑电图模式是MCHI结局的危险因素(RR = 2.909,95%CI:1.611-5.253,Mantel-Haenszelχ2= 11.110,P = 0.001),它们可以预测不良的结局与发生率为66.67%(16/24),准确度为73.63%。发病后1-3 d(rs =-0.354,P = 0.002)和4-7 d(rs =-0.417,P = 0.000)期间Synek量表和GOS评分之间均存在显着负相关,表明较高Synek量表的结果越差。准确性(83.33%vs 70.78%;χ2= 4.000,P = 0.039),一致性(Kappa测试:κ= 0.639,95%CI:0.522-0.746 vsκ= 0.406,95%CI:0.353-0.459; P = 0.001 )和Synek量表的曲线下面积(0.86±0.05,95%CI:0.761-0.958 vs 0.69±0.07,95%CI:0.554-0.822; P = 0.002)来预测4-7 d期间的长期结局发病后明显高于发病后1-3 d。结论MCHI发作后1-3 d的脑电图模式和Synek量表可用于评估脑损伤的严重程度和进一步指导治疗,而发作后4-7 d的Synek量表可用于评估长期脑梗死的时间。足月结局和高精度治疗。DOI:10.3969 / j.issn.1672-6731.2015.12.005。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号