首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >A contrast study on the curative effect between trepanation and drainage and decompressive craniotomy for treating cerebellar hemorrhage
【24h】

A contrast study on the curative effect between trepanation and drainage and decompressive craniotomy for treating cerebellar hemorrhage

机译:截流引流与减压开颅手术治疗小脑出血疗效对比研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Thirty-three cases of hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage were involved in this survey, with the bleeding volume over 10 ml. All of them were given external ventricular drainage and then taken continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) after admission. Within 7-24 h after the onset, they all underwent trepanation and drainage under local anesthesia. In the same period, another 33 cases of cerebellar hemorrhage patients were collected as the control, who met the inclusion criteria and were treated with conventional posterior fossa decompressive craniotomy. As results, the total efficiency of the drilling group was 81.82% (27/33), which was much better than the control group (63.64%, 21/33). However, there was no statistical significance between 2 groups (χ2 = 2.750, P = 0.097).?doi:?10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.06.014.
机译:这项调查涉及了33例高血压性小脑出血病例,出血量超过10毫升。所有患者均接受了外部脑室引流,然后在入院后连续监测颅内压(ICP)。在发病后7-24小时内,他们都在局部麻醉下进行了套扎和引流。同期,另纳入33例小脑出血患者作为对照,符合纳入标准,并接受常规后颅窝减压开颅手术治疗。结果,钻探组的总效率为81.82%(27/33),远好于对照组(63.64%,21/33)。然而,两组之间没有统计学意义(χ2= 2.750,P = 0.097)。doi:?10.3969 / j.issn.1672-6731.2014.06.014。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号