...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Clinically Diagnosing Pertussis-associated Cough in Adults and Children: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
【24h】

Clinically Diagnosing Pertussis-associated Cough in Adults and Children: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

机译:成人和儿童与百日咳有关的咳嗽的临床诊断:CHEST指南和专家小组报告

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The decision to treat a suspected case of pertussis with antibiotics is usually based on a clinical diagnosis rather than waiting for laboratory confirmation. The current guideline focuses on making the clinical diagnosis of pertussis-associated cough in adults and children. Methods The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodologic guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework were used. The Expert Cough Panel based their recommendations on findings from a systematic review that was recently published on the topic; final grading was reached by consensus according to Delphi methodology. The systematic review was carried out to answer the Key Clinical Question: In patients presenting with cough, how can we most accurately diagnose from clinical features alone those who have pertussis-associated cough as opposed to other causes of cough? Results In adults, after pre-specified meta-analysis exclusions, pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated for only 4 clinical features: paroxysmal cough, post-tussive vomiting, inspiratory whooping, and absence of fever. Both paroxysmal cough and absence of fever had high sensitivity (93.2%?[95% CI, 83.2-97.4] and 81.8%?[95% CI, 72.2-88.7], respectively) and low specificity (20.6%?[95% CI, 14.7-28.1] and 18.8%?[95% CI, 8.1-37.9]). Inspiratory whooping and posttussive vomiting had a low sensitivity (32.5%?[95% CI, 24.5-41.6] and 29.8%?[95% CI, 18.0-45.2]) but high specificity (77.7%?[95% CI, 73.1-81.7] and 79.5%?[95% CI, 69.4-86.9]). In children, after pre-specified meta-analysis exclusions, pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated for only 1 clinical feature in children (0-18 years): posttussive vomiting. Posttussive vomiting in children was only moderately sensitive (60.0%?[95% CI, 40.3-77.0]) and specific (66.0%?[95% CI, 52.5-77.3]). Conclusions In adults with acute (
机译:背景技术决定使用抗生素治疗百日咳可疑病例的决定通常是基于临床诊断,而不是等待实验室确认。当前的指南侧重于对成人和儿童的百日咳相关咳嗽进行临床诊断。方法使用美国胸科医师学院(CHEST)的方法学指南以及建议书,评估,发展和评估框架的分级。咳嗽专家小组的建议基于最近发表的有关该主题的系统评价得出的结论;根据Delphi方法,最终达成共识。进行系统评价以回答关键的临床问题:在出现咳嗽的患者中,我们如何仅凭临床特征最准确地诊断与百日咳相关的咳嗽而不是其他咳嗽原因的患者?结果在成人中,经过预先指定的荟萃分析排除后,仅针对4种临床特征(阵发性咳嗽,咳嗽后呕吐,吸气百日咳和不发烧)汇总了敏感性和特异性的估计值。阵发性咳嗽和不发烧均具有较高的敏感性(分别为93.2%?[95%CI,83.2-97.4]和81.8%?[95%CI,72.2-88.7])和低特异性(20.6%?[95%CI] ,14.7-28.1]和18.8%?[95%CI,8.1-37.9]。吸气百日咳和呕吐后敏感性低(32.5%?[95%CI,24.5-41.6]和29.8%?[95%CI,18.0-45.2]),但特异性高(77.7%?[95%CI,73.1- 81.7]和79.5%?[95%CI,69.4-86.9]。在儿童中,经过预先指定的荟萃分析排除后,仅针对儿童(0-18岁)的一种临床特征(咳嗽后呕吐)汇总了敏感性和特异性的汇总估计。儿童的咳嗽后呕吐仅是中度敏感的(60.0%?[95%CI,40.3-77.0])和特异的(66.0%?[95%CI,52.5-77.3])。结论成人急性(

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号