...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell Reports >Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites
【24h】

Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites

机译:内在DNA形状解释Hox辅因子结合位点之间的亲和力差异。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Transcription factors bind to their binding sites over a wide range of affinities, yet how differences in affinity are encoded in DNA sequences is not well understood. Here, we report X-ray crystal structures of four heterodimers of the Hox protein AbdominalB bound with its cofactor Extradenticle to four target DNA molecules that differ in affinity by up to ~20-fold. Remarkably, despite large differences in affinity, the overall structures are very similar in all four complexes. In contrast, the predicted shapes of the DNA binding sites (i.e., the intrinsic DNA shape) in the absence of bound protein are strikingly different from each other and correlate with affinity: binding sites that must change conformations upon protein binding have lower affinities than binding sites that have more optimal conformations prior to binding. Together, these observations suggest that intrinsic differences in DNA shape provide a robust mechanism for modulating affinity without affecting other protein-DNA interactions.
机译:发明内容转录因子在广泛的亲和力上与其结合位点结合,但是人们对DNA序列中亲和力的差异如何编码尚不十分了解。在这里,我们报道了Hox蛋白AbdominalB的四个异二聚体及其辅因子Extradenticle与四个靶DNA分子的X射线晶体结构,这些靶DNA分子的亲和力相差高达20倍。值得注意的是,尽管亲和力差异很大,但所有四个复合物的整体结构都非常相似。相反,在不存在结合蛋白的情况下,DNA结合位点的预测形状(即固有的DNA形状)彼此显着不同,并且与亲和力相关:必须在结合蛋白质后改变构象的结合位点的亲和力低于结合结合前具有最佳构象的位点。总之,这些观察结果表明,DNA形状的内在差异为调节亲和力而不影响其他蛋白质与DNA的相互作用提供了强大的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号