首页> 外文期刊>Case Studies in Thermal Engineering >Investigation of intercooler-effectiveness on exergo-economic and exergo-sustainability parameters of modified Brayton cycles
【24h】

Investigation of intercooler-effectiveness on exergo-economic and exergo-sustainability parameters of modified Brayton cycles

机译:改进的布雷顿循环的中冷器对能效-经济性和能效-可持续性参数的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The paper investigates the variants of intercooler effectiveness on exergo-economic and exergo-sustainability indicators of modified Brayton cycles. The objective is to ascertain how the variant in the intercooler effectiveness affects the exergy-based parameters. However, to achieve this, a component by component exergy-cost balances was established. The considered cycles include: the non-specific cycle (Case 1) comprising a gas turbine (GT), intercooler (IC), heat exchanger (HE) and reheat system (REH), others include (GT+H+REH +ST, Case 2), (GT+HE +IC +REH +ST+FWH, Case 3) and (GT+HE+IC+REH +ST+2 FWH, Case 4). The calculated cycle efficiencies (Cases 1–4) varies from 17.59% to 28.84% for intercooler effectiveness of 0.75 and 0.95. The exergy destruction within this range was 0.97%, 1.26%, 0.89% and 1.23% (Cases 1, 2 3 and 4) respectively. The component exergy destruction cost (CEDC) fluctuated between3.85≤CEDC≤229.1$/hr,5.61E?06≤CEDC≤229.1$/h,1.46E?06≤CEDC≤229.1$/hrand5.61E?06≤CEDC≤229.1$/hrfor same order. Additionally, the exergo-sustainability indicators: exergy waste ratio (EWR), environmental effect factor (EFF) and exergetic sustainability index (ESI) were estimated between17.59≤EEF≤28.84%,0.433≤EWR≤0.6359,1.55≤ EFF ≤3.60 and 0.277≤ ESI ≤0.644. Conclusively, the intercooler and other modifications have a marginal effect but Cases 4 and 3 was most sustainable with considerable ESI.
机译:本文研究了改进的布雷顿循环的中冷器效率的能效经济指标和能效可持续性指标的变化。目的是确定中冷器效率的变化如何影响基于火用的参数。但是,为实现这一目标,建立了逐个组成部分的火用成本成本平衡。考虑的循环包括:非特定循环(案例1),包括燃气轮机(GT),中冷器(IC),热交换器(HE)和再热系统(REH),其他包括(GT + H + REH + ST,情况2)(GT + HE + IC + REH + ST + FWH,情况3)和(GT + HE + IC + REH + ST + 2 + FWH,情况4)。对于中间冷却器效率为0.75和0.95的情况,计算得出的循环效率(案例1-4)从17.59%到28.84%不等。在此范围内的火用破坏分别为0.97%,1.26%,0.89%和1.23%(案例1、2 3和4)。火用成分破坏成本(CEDC)在3.85≤CEDC≤229.1$ / hr,5.61E?06≤CEDC≤229.1$ / h,1.46E?06≤CEDC≤229.1$ / hrand5.61E?06≤CEDC≤之间波动同一订单229.1美元/小时此外,估计了能效可持续性指标:能效浪费率(EWR),环境影响因子(EFF)和能效可持续性指数(ESI)在17.59≤EEF≤28.84%,0.433≤EWR≤0.6359、1.55≤ EFF≤3.60之间和0.277≤ESI≤0.644。总之,中冷器和其他修改措施的影响很小,但案例4和案例3在具有相当大的ESI的情况下最为可持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号