...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exergy >Comparative study of three modified sCO_2 Brayton recompression cycles based on energy and exergy analysis with GA optimisation
【24h】

Comparative study of three modified sCO_2 Brayton recompression cycles based on energy and exergy analysis with GA optimisation

机译:基于GA优化的能量和辐射分析三种改性SCO_2 Brayton重新压缩循环的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As one popular supercritical CO_(2)(sCO_(2)) power cycle, the recompression cycle has attracted various modifications. However, comparative studies are still required to determine whether these modifications are necessary. In this paper, three modifications on the original recompression cycle(I) are compared, which are reheating cycle(II), partial cooling cycle(III), and reheated partial cooling cycle(IV). Thermodynamic states are calculated based on the recuperator effectiveness, and the split ratio, reheating pressure and pre-cooling pressure are calculated by genetic algorithm (GA). The thermal efficiencies are calculated as 40.01%, 40.44%, 39.88%, and 41.63%. The exergy efficiencies are 55.49%, 56.07%, 55.27% and 57.69%. It reveals that only reheated partial cooling cycle improves the performance, neither reheating cycle nor partial cooling cycle. This conclusion is not limited to specific parameters as the parametric study indicates. One explanation from the exergy analysis is that the reheated partial cooling cycle combines the edges of both reheating and partial cooling modifications.
机译:作为一种流行的超临界CO_(2)(SCO_(2))电源循环,重新构建周期引起了各种修改。然而,仍然需要比较研究来确定是否需要这些修改。在本文中,比较了对原始再压缩周期(I)的三种修改,其是再加热循环(II),部分冷却循环(III)和再加热部分冷却循环(IV)。基于恢复器效能计算热力学状态,并且通过遗传算法(GA)计算分流比,再加热压力和预冷却压力。热效率计算为40.01%,40.44%,39.88%和41.63%。漏洞效率为55.49%,56.07%,55.27%和57.69%。揭示只有重新加热的部分冷却循环只能提高性能,既不再加热循环也不是部分冷却循环。随着参数研究表明,该结论不限于特定参数。来自Deergy分析的一个解释是重新加热的部分冷却循环结合了再加热和部分冷却修改的边缘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号