首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Ultrasound >Reliability of three-dimensional color flow Doppler and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery
【24h】

Reliability of three-dimensional color flow Doppler and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery

机译:三维彩色血流多普勒和二维脉搏波多普勒经胸超声心动图估计心脏手术后心输出量的可靠性

获取原文
       

摘要

Three-dimensional color flow Doppler (3DCF) is a new convenient technique for cardiac output (CO) measurement. However, to date, no one has evaluated the accuracy of 3DCF echocardiography for CO measurement after cardiac surgery. Therefore, this single-center, prospective study was designed to evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional color flow and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler (2D-PWD) transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery. Post-cardiac surgical patients with a good acoustic window and a low dose or no dose of vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine ?0.05?μg/kg/min) were enrolled for CO estimation. Three different methods (third generation FloTrac/Vigileo? [FT/V] system as the reference method, 3DCF, and 2D-PWD) were used to estimate CO before and after interventions (baseline, after volume expansion, and after a dobutamine test). A total of 20 patients were enrolled in this study, and 59 pairs of CO measurements were collected (one pair was not included because of increasing drainage after the dobutamine test). Pearson’s coefficients were 0.260 between the CO-FT/V and CO-PWD measurements and 0.729 between the CO-FT/V and CO-3DCF measurements. Bland-Altman analysis showed the bias between the absolute values of CO-FT/V and CO-PWD measurements was ??0.6?L/min with limits of agreement between ??3.3?L/min and 2.2?L/min, with a percentage error (PE) of 61.3%. The bias between CO-FT/V and CO-3DCF was ??0.14?L/min with limits of agreement between ??1.42?L /min and 1.14?L/min, with a PE of 29.9%. Four-quadrant plot analysis showed the concordance rate between ΔCO-PWD and ΔCO-3FT/V was 93.3%. In a comparison with the FT/V system, 3DCF transthoracic echocardiography could accurately estimate CO in post-cardiac surgical patients, and the two methods could be considered interchangeable. Although 2D-PWD echocardiography was not as accurate as the 3D technique, its ability to track directional changes was reliable.
机译:三维彩色多普勒(3DCF)是一种用于心输出量(CO)测量的新便捷技术。然而,迄今为止,尚无人评估心脏手术后3DCF超声心动图对CO测量的准确性。因此,该单中心前瞻性研究旨在评估三维彩色血流和二维脉搏波多普勒(2D-PWD)经胸超声心动图的可靠性,以评估心脏手术后的心输出量。纳入心脏术后手术的患者,这些患者具有良好的声学窗口,低剂量或无剂量的血管活性药物(去甲肾上腺素<?0.05?μg/ kg / min)用于CO评估。三种不同的方法(第三代FloTrac / Vigileo?[FT / V]系统作为参考方法,3DCF和2D-PWD)被用来估算干预前后的CO(基线,体积扩大后和多巴酚丁胺试验后) 。本研究共招募了20位患者,并收集了59对CO测量值(由于多巴酚丁胺试验后引流增加,所以未包括一对CO测量值)。在CO-FT / V和CO-PWD测量之间,皮尔逊系数为0.260,在CO-FT / V和CO-3DCF测量之间为0.729。 Bland-Altman分析显示,CO-FT / V和CO-PWD测量的绝对值之间的偏差为≤0.6?L / min,一致极限在≤3.3?L / min和2.2?L / min之间,百分比误差(PE)为61.3%。 CO-FT / V和CO-3DCF之间的偏差为≤0.14?L / min,一致极限在≤1.42?L / min和1.14?L / min之间,PE为29.9%。四象限图分析表明,ΔCO-PWD与ΔCO-3FT/ V的一致性率为93.3%。与FT / V系统相比,3DCF经胸超声心动图可以准确估计心脏手术后患者的CO,这两种方法可以互换。尽管2D-PWD超声心动图不如3D技术准确,但其跟踪方向变化的能力是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号