首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Diabetology >Effects of oral glucose-lowering drugs on long term outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus following myocardial infarction not treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention - a retrospective nationwide cohort study
【24h】

Effects of oral glucose-lowering drugs on long term outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus following myocardial infarction not treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention - a retrospective nationwide cohort study

机译:一项全国性回顾性队列研究,未接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的口服降糖药对糖尿病合并心肌梗死患者长期结局的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The optimum oral pharmacological treatment of diabetes mellitus to reduce cardiovascular disease and mortality following myocardial infarction has not been established. We therefore set out to investigate the association between individual oral glucose-lowering drugs and cardiovascular outcomes following myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus not treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention. Materials and methods All patients aged 30 years or older receiving glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) and admitted with myocardial infarction (MI) not treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in Denmark during 1997-2006 were identified by individual-level linkage of nationwide registries of hospitalizations and drug dispensing from pharmacies. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, comorbidity, and concomitant pharmacotherapy were used to assess differences in the composite endpoint of non-fatal MI and cardiovascular mortality between individual GLDs, using metformin monotherapy as reference. Results The study comprised 9876 users of GLDs admitted with MI. The mean age was 72.3 years and 56.5% of patients were men. A total of 3649 received sulfonylureas and 711 received metformin at admission. The average length of follow-up was 2.2 (SD 2.6) years. A total of 6,171 patients experienced the composite study endpoint. The sulfonylureas glibenclamide, glimepiride, glipizide, and tolbutamide were associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and/or nonfatal MI with hazard ratios [HRs] of 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.46), 1.19 (1.06-1.32), 1.25 (1.11-1.42), and 1.18 (1.03-1.34), respectively, compared with metformin. Gliclazide was the only sulfonylurea not associated with increased risk compared with metformin (HR 1.03 [0.88-1.22]). Conclusions In patients with diabetes mellitus admitted with MI not treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, monotherapy treatment with the sulfonylureas glibenclamide, glimepiride, glipizide, and tolbutamide was associated with increased cardiovascular risk compared with metformin monotherapy.
机译:背景技术尚未建立降低糖尿病的心肌梗塞后心血管疾病和死亡率的最佳口服药物治疗方法。因此,我们着手研究未经急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者在心肌梗塞后口服降糖药物与心血管预后之间的关系。资料和方法在丹麦,1997-2006年间,所有年龄在30岁以上且接受降糖药(GLD)且未接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗塞(MI)的患者均通过全国注册机构的个人联系进行鉴定药房的住院和配药。使用二甲双胍单药治疗,对年龄,性别,日历年,合并症和伴随药物治疗进行了调整的多变量Cox回归模型用于评估非致命性心肌梗死的复合终点差异和单个GLD之间的心血管死亡率。结果该研究包括9876名接受MI的GLD用户。平均年龄为72.3岁,男性患者为56.5%。入院时共有3649人接受了磺脲类药物,711人接受了二甲双胍。平均随访时间为2.2(SD 2.6)年。共有6,171名患者经历了综合研究终点。磺酰脲类格列本脲,格列美脲,格列吡嗪和甲苯磺丁酰胺与心血管死亡和/或非致命性心肌梗死的风险增加相关,危险比[HRs]为1.31(95%置信区间[CI] 1.17-1.46),1.19(1.06-1.32)与二甲双胍相比,分别为1.25(1.11-1.42)和1.18(1.03-1.34)。与二甲双胍相比,格列齐特是唯一不增加风险的磺酰脲类药物(HR 1.03 [0.88-1.22])。结论对于未接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的合并MI的糖尿病患者,与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,磺脲类药物格列本脲,格列美脲,格列吡嗪和甲苯磺丁酰胺的单药治疗与心血管风险增加相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号