首页> 外文期刊>Cancer science. >Which is false: Oxaliplatin or fluoropyrimidine? An analysis of patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first‐line epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody
【24h】

Which is false: Oxaliplatin or fluoropyrimidine? An analysis of patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first‐line epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody

机译:哪个错误:奥沙利铂或氟嘧啶?一线表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体治疗的KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractThis meta-analysis was performed to determine whether the addition of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy treatment improves efficacy in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and whether infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin is a preferred combination for EGFR mAbs. Oxaliplatin (including treatment), EGFR mAbs, first-line treatment, KRAS wild-type, and mCRC were used as key words. The PRIME, OPUS, COIN, and NORDIC VII trials were identified by two independent authors. Time-to-event outcomes of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using HRs (hazard ratios) with fixed effect, and response rate (RR) using odd ratios (OR) with fixed effect. A total of 1767 patients who were KRAS wild-type were included in this meta-analysis, with 866 patients in the mAbs and chemotherapy combination group and 901 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The addition of mAbs to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC as first-line treatment resulted in significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–0.99; P = 0.03) and response rate (RR) (OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.66; P = 0.009) compared with chemotherapy alone, but the difference in OS was not significant (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85–1.08; P = 0.48). However, the differences in OS and PFS were not significant when mAbs were added to bolus 5-FU or capecitabine-based regimens compared with chemotherapy alone, whereas PFS improved with an infusional 5-FU and oxaliplatin combination (P = 0.06; PFS, HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.86; P = 0.0002), and even OS was marginally significant, which was consistent with the subgroup analysis of cetuximab and panitumumab. EGFR mAbs combined with oxaliplatin and an infusional 5-FU regimen was associated with significantly improved RR, PFS and OS as first-line treatment in KRAS wild-type mCRC.
机译:摘要进行这项荟萃分析,以确定在基于奥沙利铂的化学疗法中添加表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的单克隆抗体(mAbs)是否能提高KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效以及输注5氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)和奥沙利铂是EGFR mAb的优选组合。使用奥沙利铂(包括治疗),EGFR mAb,一线治疗,KRAS野生型和mCRC作为关键词。两名独立作者确定了PRIME,OPUS,COIN和NORDIC VII试验。使用具有固定作用的HR(危险比)分析总生存时间(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的事件至事件结果,并使用具有固定作用的奇数比(OR)分析响应率(RR)。该荟萃分析共纳入1767例KRAS野生型患者,其中mAbs和化疗联合治疗组为866例患者,而单纯化疗治疗组为901例。一线治疗KRAS野生型mCRC患者在基于奥沙利铂的化疗中添加单克隆抗体导致PFS显着改善(HR = 0.88; 95%置信区间(CI),0.79-0.99; P = 0.03)和与单独化疗相比,缓解率(RR)(OR = 1.38; 95%CI,1.14-1.66; P = 0.009),但OS差异不显着(HR = 0.96; 95%CI,0.85-1.08; P = 0.48)。但是,与单药化疗相比,在单剂量5-FU或基于卡培他滨的方案中添加mAb时,OS和PFS差异不显着,而输注5-FU和奥沙利铂联合时PFS改善(P = 0.06; PFS,HR = 0.76; 95%CI,0.65–0.86; P = 0.0002),甚至OS均微不足道,这与西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗的亚组分析一致。 EGFR mAb联合奥沙利铂和5-FU输注方案与KRAS野生型mCRC的一线治疗显着改善RR,PFS和OS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号