首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology and therapy. >Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation
【24h】

Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation

机译:达比加群对华法林与房颤直流电复律的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionDirect current cardioversion (DCCV) is considered as the most effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, and DCCV may increase this risk. The current recommendation is, therefore, to anticoagulate for at least 3?weeks before DCCV and 4?weeks after the procedure. MethodsA retrospective study of patients referred for elective DCCV as treatment for AF in Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of dabigatran with warfarin in this setting. ResultsDuring a 12-month period, 129 patients were referred for DCCV for the treatment of AF and 107 patients received DCCV. Fifty-four patients were anticoagulated with dabigatran, 42 patients with warfarin, and 11 patients with other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with choice of agent determined following an informed discussion with the patient. The average number of days between the date of referral for DCCV and the date of DCCV for patients who were on dabigatran was 51?days, while for warfarin, this was 82 ( P =?0.001). The proportion of cancelation and rescheduling for warfarin patients was 21.4%, while for dabigatran, this was 5.5%. Patients were reviewed 6–20?weeks after DCCV; the success rate of DCCV for dabigatran patients was 61%, whilst for warfarin patients, this was 52%. The success rate went up to 69% for patients who received DCCV within 45?days of referral ( P =?0.165). ConclusionThis retrospective study supports clinical experience that DCCV is more likely to be successful when there is a shorter duration between the onset of AF and the date of DCCV, and shows that the use of dabigatran in comparison with warfarin facilitates earlier DCCV.
机译:简介直流电复律(DCCV)被认为是房颤(AF)的最有效治疗方法。 AF与血栓栓塞的风险增加相关,而DCCV可能会增加这种风险。因此,目前的建议是在DCCV前至少3周和手术后4周进行抗凝治疗。方法对汉普郡医院NHS基金会信托基金中选择DCCV作为AF的患者进行回顾性研究,以比较在这种情况下达比加群与华法林的安全性和有效性。结果在12个月内,有129例患者接受DCCV进行房颤治疗,107例患者接受了DCCV。 54名患者接受达比加群抗凝治疗,42名华法令患者抗凝,11名其他直接​​口服抗凝剂(DOAC)患者进行抗凝治疗,并与患者进行了充分的讨论。接受达比加群治疗的患者从DCCV转诊之日至DCCV日期之间的平均天数为51天,而华法林为82天(P = 0.001)。华法林患者的取消和重新安排的比例为21.4%,而达比加群则为5.5%。 DCCV后6-20周对患者进行了复查;达比加群患者DCCV的成功率为61%,华法林患者为52%。在转诊后45天内接受DCCV的患者成功率高达69%(P =?0.165)。结论这项回顾性研究支持临床经验,即房颤发作至DCCV日期之间的持续时间较短时,DCCV更有可能成功,并显示达比加群与华法林相比可促进早期DCCV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号