首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology Journal >Schoolteachers as candidates to be basic life support trainers: A simulation trial
【24h】

Schoolteachers as candidates to be basic life support trainers: A simulation trial

机译:作为基本生活支持培训师的候选人成为学校教师:模拟试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The aim was to assess future schoolteachers’ basic life support (BLS) knowledge and willingness to include this content in school lessons. The aim was also to determine the learning effect of a brief BLS hands-on training session, supported by real-time feedback. Methods: A convenience sample of 98 University students of Educational Sciences and Sports were recruited. The training program consisted of brief theoretical and hands-on interactive sessions with a 2/10 instructor/participants ratio. Knowledge and willingness was assessed by means of a survey. Chest compressions (CC) and ventilation quality were registered in 47 cases during 1 min cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) tests. Results: Fifty-eight percent of subjects declared to know how to perform CPR, 62% knew the correct chest compression/ventilation ratio but only one in four knew the CC quality standards. Eighty-eight percent knew what an automated external defibrillator (AED) was; willingness to use the device improved from 70% to 98% after training. Almost half of CCs were performed atan adequate rate. Men performed deeper compressions than women (56.1 ± 4.03 mm vs. 52.17 ± 5.51 mm, p = 0.007), but in both cases the mean value was within recommendations. Full chest recoil was better in women (72.2 ± 32.8% vs. 45.4 ± 32.9%, p = 0.009). All CCs were delivered with correct hand positions. Conclusions: Brief hands-on training supported by real-time feedback of CPR quality helps future schoolteachers improve their knowledge, self-confidence and CPR skills. BLS training should be implemented in University curricula for schoolteachers in order to promote their engagement in effective BLS training of schoolchildren.
机译:背景:目的是评估未来教师的基本生活支持(BLS)知识以及是否愿意将此内容纳入学校课程。目的还在于确定在实时反馈的支持下,简短的BLS动手培训课程的学习效果。方法:收集98名教育科学与体育专业学生的便利样本。培训计划包括简短的理论和动手互动课程,讲师/参与者比例为2/10。通过调查评估知识和意愿。在1分钟的心肺复苏(CPR)测试中,记录了47例患者的胸部按压(CC)和通风质量。结果:58%的受试者宣布知道如何进行心肺复苏,62%的受试者知道正确的胸部按压/通气比,但只有四分之一的人知道CC质量标准。 88%的人知道自动体外除颤器(AED)是什么;训练后使用该设备的意愿从70%提高到98%。几乎一半的CC均以足够的速度执行。男性比女性进行更深的按压(56.1±4.03 mm对52.17±5.51 mm,p = 0.007),但在两种情况下,平均值均在建议范围内。女性的全胸后坐力更好(72.2±32.8%vs. 45.4±32.9%,p = 0.009)。所有CC均交付了正确的手位。结论:简短的动手培训以及CPR质量的实时反馈支持可帮助未来的教师提高其知识,自信心和CPR技能。应在大学课程中为学校教师实施BLS培训,以促进他们参与对学生的有效BLS培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号