首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Limb‐sparing surgery plus radiotherapy results in superior survival: an analysis of patients with high‐grade, extremity soft‐tissue sarcoma from the NCDB and SEER
【24h】

Limb‐sparing surgery plus radiotherapy results in superior survival: an analysis of patients with high‐grade, extremity soft‐tissue sarcoma from the NCDB and SEER

机译:四肢保留手术加放疗可提高生存率:通过NCDB和SEER分析患有高级别,肢端软组织肉瘤的患者

获取原文
           

摘要

Small randomized trials have not shown an overall survival (OS) difference among local treatment modalities for patients with extremity soft‐tissue sarcomas (E‐STS) but were underpowered for OS. We examine the impact of local treatment modalities on OS and sarcoma mortality (SM) using two national registries. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were analyzed separately to identify patients with stage II‐III, high‐grade E‐STS diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with (1) amputation alone, (2) limb‐sparing surgery (LSS) alone, (3) preoperative radiation therapy (RT) and LSS, or (4) LSS and postoperative RT. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) and 1:1 matched pair analyses (MPAs) examined treatment impacts on OS (both databases) and SM (SEER only). From the NCDB and SEER, 7828 and 2937 patients were included. On MVAs, amputation was associated with inferior OS and SM. Relative to LSS alone, both preoperative RT and LSS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.62‐0.78) and LSS and postoperative RT (HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63‐0.75) improved OS in NCDB analyses with confirmation by SEER. Estimated median survivals from MPA utilizing NCDB data were 7.2?years with LSS alone (95% CI: 6.5‐8.9?years) vs 9.8?years (95% CI: 9.0‐11.2?years) with LSS and postoperative RT. A MPA comparing preoperative RT and LSS to LSS alone found median survivals of 8.9?years (95% CI: 7.9‐not estimable) and 6.6?years (95% CI: 5.4‐7.8?years). Optimal high‐grade E‐STS management includes LSS with preoperative or postoperative RT as evidenced by superior OS and SM.
机译:小型随机试验并未显示四肢软组织肉瘤(E-STS)患者的局部治疗方式之间的总生存(OS)差异,但OS的动力不足。我们使用两个国家注册机构检查了局部治疗方式对OS和肉瘤死亡率(SM)的影响。对国家癌症数据库(NCDB)和监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划分别进行了分析,以鉴定2004年至2013年间诊断为II-III期,高级别E-STS并经(1)截肢治疗的患者(2)仅保留肢体手术(LSS),(3)术前放疗(RT)和LSS或(4)LSS和术后RT。多变量分析(MVA)和1:1匹配对分析(MPA)检查了治疗对OS(两个数据库)和SM(仅SEER)的影响。来自NCDB和SEER的患者包括7828和2937名患者。在MVA上,截肢与OS和SM不良有关。相对于单独的LSS,术前RT和LSS(HR,0.70; 95%CI:0.62-0.78)和LSS和术后RT(HR,0.69; 95%CI:0.63-0.75)均可改善NCDB分析中的OS,并通过SEER确认。仅使用LSS估计的MPA使用NCDB数据的中位生存期为7.2年(95%CI:6.5-8.9?年),而使用LSS和术后RT则为9.8年(95%CI:9.0-11.2?年)。 MPA将术前放疗和LSS与仅LSS进行比较,发现中位生存期为8.9年(95%CI:7.9-不可估计)和6.6年(95%CI:5.4-7.8年)。最佳的高级E-STS管理包括具有术前或术后RT的LSS,如出色的OS和SM所证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号