首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Limb‐sparing surgery plus radiotherapy results in superior survival: an analysis of patients with high‐grade extremity soft‐tissue sarcoma from the NCDB and SEER
【2h】

Limb‐sparing surgery plus radiotherapy results in superior survival: an analysis of patients with high‐grade extremity soft‐tissue sarcoma from the NCDB and SEER

机译:四肢保留手术加放疗可提高生存率:通过NCDB和SEER对高级别肢端软组织肉瘤患者进行分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Small randomized trials have not shown an overall survival (OS) difference among local treatment modalities for patients with extremity soft‐tissue sarcomas (E‐STS) but were underpowered for OS. We examine the impact of local treatment modalities on OS and sarcoma mortality (SM) using two national registries. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were analyzed separately to identify patients with stage II‐III, high‐grade E‐STS diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with (1) amputation alone, (2) limb‐sparing surgery (LSS) alone, (3) preoperative radiation therapy (RT) and LSS, or (4) LSS and postoperative RT. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) and 1:1 matched pair analyses ( style="fixed-case">MPAs) examined treatment impacts on style="fixed-case">OS (both databases) and style="fixed-case">SM ( style="fixed-case">SEER only). From the style="fixed-case">NCDB and style="fixed-case">SEER, 7828 and 2937 patients were included. On style="fixed-case">MVAs, amputation was associated with inferior style="fixed-case">OS and style="fixed-case">SM. Relative to style="fixed-case">LSS alone, both preoperative style="fixed-case">RT and style="fixed-case">LSS ( style="fixed-case">HR, 0.70; 95% style="fixed-case">CI: 0.62‐0.78) and style="fixed-case">LSS and postoperative style="fixed-case">RT ( style="fixed-case">HR, 0.69; 95% style="fixed-case">CI: 0.63‐0.75) improved style="fixed-case">OS in style="fixed-case">NCDB analyses with confirmation by style="fixed-case">SEER. Estimated median survivals from style="fixed-case">MPA utilizing style="fixed-case">NCDB data were 7.2 years with style="fixed-case">LSS alone (95% style="fixed-case">CI: 6.5‐8.9 years) vs 9.8 years (95% style="fixed-case">CI: 9.0‐11.2 years) with style="fixed-case">LSS and postoperative style="fixed-case">RT. A style="fixed-case">MPA comparing preoperative style="fixed-case">RT and style="fixed-case">LSS to style="fixed-case">LSS alone found median survivals of 8.9 years (95% style="fixed-case">CI: 7.9‐not estimable) and 6.6 years (95% style="fixed-case">CI: 5.4‐7.8 years). Optimal high‐grade E‐ style="fixed-case">STS management includes style="fixed-case">LSS with preoperative or postoperative style="fixed-case">RT as evidenced by superior style="fixed-case">OS and style="fixed-case">SM.
机译:小型随机试验并未显示四肢软组织肉瘤(E-STS)患者的局部治疗方式之间的总生存(OS)差异,但OS的动力不足。我们使用两个国家注册机构检查了局部治疗方式对OS和肉瘤死亡率(SM)的影响。对国家癌症数据库(NCDB)和监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划分别进行了分析,以鉴定2004年至2013年间诊断为II-III期,高级别E-STS并经(1)截肢治疗的患者(2)仅保留肢体手术(LSS),(3)术前放疗(RT)和LSS或(4)LSS和术后RT。多变量分析(MVA)和1:1匹配对分析( style =“ fixed-case”> MPA s)检验了治疗对 style =“ fixed-case”> OS (两个数据库)和 style =“ fixed-case”> SM (仅 style =“ fixed-case”> SEER )。在 style =“ fixed-case”> NCDB 和 style =“ fixed-case”> SEER 中,纳入了7828和2937例患者。在 style =“ fixed-case”> MVA s上,截肢与劣质的 style =“ fixed-case”> OS 和 style =“ fixed-case”> SM 。相对于单独的 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS ,术前 style =“ fixed-case”> RTS 和 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS span>( style =“ fixed-case”> HR ,0.70; 95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI :0.62-0.78)和 style =“ fixed -case“> LSS 和术后 style =” fixed-case“> RT ( style =” fixed-case“> HR ,0.69; 95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI :0.63-0.75)在 style =“ fixed-case”> NCDB 分析中改进了 style =“ fixed-case”> OS 并通过 style =“ fixed-case”> SEER 进行确认。使用 style =“ fixed-case”> NCDB 数据, style =“ fixed-case”> MPA 估计的中位生存期为7.2年,而 style =“ fixed-case”>仅LSS (95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI :6.5-8.9年)对9.8年(95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI >:9.0-11.2年),并具有 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS 和术后 style =“ fixed-case”> RT 。 style =“ fixed-case”> MPA 比较术前 style =“ fixed-case”> RT 和 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS 与仅 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS 仅发现中位生存期为8.9年(95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI :7.9无法估计)和6.6年( 95% style =“ fixed-case”> CI :5.4-7.8年)。最佳的高档E- style =“ fixed-case”> STS 管理包括 style =“ fixed-case”> LSS 与术前或术后 style =“ fixed-case “> RT ,由高级 style =” fixed-case“> OS 和 style =” fixed-case“> SM 证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号