首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology and therapy. >Risk of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events with β-Blockers in Hypertensive Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Risk of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events with β-Blockers in Hypertensive Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:一项回顾性队列研究:高血压患者使用β受体阻滞剂治疗心血管事件的住院风险

获取原文
       

摘要

Introductionβ-Blockers are a heterogenous class of drugs that are no longer recommended for initial antihypertension monotherapy due to unfavorable long-term cardiovascular events observed with non-vasodilatory β-blockers. However, the comparative cardiovascular event risk between the vasodilatory β1-selective antagonist/β3 agonist nebivolol and non-vasodilatory β1-blockers, atenolol and metoprolol, is unknown. Methods?90?day supply gap), use of other β-blockers, or end of continuous plan enrollment. Patients were pair-wise propensity score-matched using logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, comorbid chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatic disease, renal disease, and diabetes, and use of other antihypertensive drugs during baseline. Time to first hospital claim for a cardiovascular event was assessed via Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for the variables above. ResultsInclusion criteria were met by 81,402 patients ( n =?27,134 in each matched treatment cohort), with no between-cohort differences in baseline characteristics, comorbid conditions, or average follow-up duration. Atenolol and metoprolol cohorts had greater risk of hospitalization for a composite event (myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, stroke) than nebivolol users (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] atenolol: 1.68 [1.29, 2.17]; metoprolol: 2.05 [1.59, 2.63]; P ConclusionsNebivolol was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to composite cardiovascular events than atenolol or metoprolol in this large retrospective cohort study of monotherapy with three different β1-selective blockers in hypertensive patients. FundingAllergan plc, Madison, NJ, USA.
机译:简介β-阻滞剂是一类异类药物,由于非血管扩张性β-阻滞剂的长期心血管事件不利,因此不再推荐用于初始抗高血压单药治疗。但是,尚不清楚血管舒张性β1选择性拮抗剂/β3激动剂奈必洛尔与非血管舒张性β1受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔和美托洛尔之间的相对心血管事件风险。方法(90天的供应缺口),使用其他β受体阻滞剂或结束连续计划入学。使用逻辑回归对患者进行成对倾向评分配对,对基线人口统计学,Charlson合并症指数评分,合并症慢性肺病,风湿性疾病,肾病和糖尿病以及基线期间使用其他降压药进行调整。通过Cox比例风险回归对上述变量进行调整,以评估首次就诊心血管事件的时间。结果81,402例患者符合入组标准(每个匹配的治疗队列中n = 27,134),队列间基线特征,合并症或平均随访时间无差异。阿替洛尔和美托洛尔的人群发生复合事件(心肌梗塞,心绞痛,充血性心力衰竭,中风)的住院风险要高于奈比洛尔使用者(调整后的危险比[95%置信区间]阿替洛尔:1.68 [1.29,2.17];美托洛尔:2.05 [1.59,2.63]; P结论在这项针对高血压患者采用三种不同的β1选择性阻滞剂的单一疗法的大型回顾性研究中,奈比洛尔与复合心血管事件相比因复合心血管事件而住院的风险显着降低。 , 美国。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号