首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Differential diagnostic value of 18/supF-FDG PET/CT for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
【24h】

Differential diagnostic value of 18/supF-FDG PET/CT for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

机译:18F-FDG PET / CT对椎体良恶性压缩性骨折的鉴别诊断价值:与磁共振成像比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), where the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients and methods: Between 2015 and 2017, we retrospectively evaluated 87 patients with 116 VCFs. MRI was performed in all the 87 patients, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT was executed in 51 patients. Three malignant features (convex posterior cortex, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement) from MRI and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from 18F-FDG PET/CT were evaluated in benign and malignant VCFs, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared in the differentiation of malignant from benign VCFs. Results: The results of our investigation showed that the sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignant VCFs were 75.6% and 77.3% for convex posterior cortex, 82.9% and 813% for epidural mass formation, and 85.7% and 70.8% for pedicle enhancement. 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated higher sensitivity (100%) but lower specificity (38.9%) as compared to MRI with regard to differentiation between benign and malignant VCFs. A significant difference in the SUVmax values was observed between the benign and malignant fractures (2.9 ± 1.0 vs 5.0 ± 1.8, P 0.01). Besides the value of SUVmax, it has been noticed that the FDG uptake pattern differed in malignant and benign fractures. Conclusion: Significant MRI findings such as convex posterior cortex, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement are highly suggestive of malignancy. 18F-FDG PET/CT reliably differentiated the fractures of malignant from benign based on both SUVmax and 18F-FDG uptake pattern. In a situation where MRI findings are not diagnostic, 18F-FDG PET/CT provides additional information as it has high sensitivity and is semiquantitative.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估2- [氟-18]-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)的鉴别诊断价值良性和恶性椎体压缩性骨折(VCF),将18F-FDG PET / CT的诊断准确性与磁共振成像(MRI)进行了比较。患者和方法:2015年至2017年,我们回顾性评估了87例116种VCF的患者。所有87例患者均进行了MRI检查,而51例患者进行了18F-FDG PET / CT检查。分别评估了良性和恶性VCF中来自MRI的三个恶性特征(凸后皮质,硬膜外肿块形成和椎弓根增强)和来自18F-FDG PET / CT的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)。比较MRI和18F-FDG PET / CT在区分良性VCF和恶性肿瘤方面的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:我们的研究结果表明,预测恶性VCFs的敏感性和特异性分别为凸后皮层为75.6%和77.3%,硬膜外肿块形成为82.9%和813%,椎弓根增强为85.7%和70.8%。就良性和恶性VCF的区分而言,与MRI相比,18F-FDG PET / CT表现出更高的敏感性(100%)但特异性更低(38.9%)。良性和恶性骨折之间的SUVmax值存在显着差异(2.9±1.0与5.0±1.8,P <0.01)。除了SUVmax的价值外,已经注意到在恶性和良性骨折中,FDG的摄取方式有所不同。结论:MRI的重要发现,例如后凸皮质,硬膜外肿块形成和椎弓根增强等,均提示恶性肿瘤。 18F-FDG PET / CT可根据SUVmax和18F-FDG摄取模式可靠地区分恶性骨折与良性骨折。在MRI表现无法诊断的情况下,18F-FDG PET / CT具有更高的灵敏度和半定量特性,因此可提供更多信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号