首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Comparative Study of Replacing FluorescentLamps by CFL and LED Lamps in Schools andUniversities and Its Impact on the Environmentand the Economy of the Country
【24h】

Comparative Study of Replacing FluorescentLamps by CFL and LED Lamps in Schools andUniversities and Its Impact on the Environmentand the Economy of the Country

机译:CFL和LED灯替换学校的荧光灯及其对国家环境和经济的影响的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

In countries of the third world such as Lebanon (case of this paper), the organizations, schools, institutes, universities, etc. are searching to economize as possible the price of installation of electrical systems such as light sources, equipment and other electrical devices without taking into consideration the high impact of the electrical bill for such installations and without taking into consideration the environmental impact such as the emission of the CO2, toxic gases, mercury and the high fuel cost. This mentality is widely spread in Lebanon because the majority of owners and investors want to install the cheapest materials in order to reduce as possible the investment cost without taking into consideration the future impact of such installations even if they know that these installations have bad impact on the electrical bill and the environment. In this paper, the authors will discuss the installation of Fluorescent lamps particularly in schools and universities and how is it possible to replace these lamps by other lamps with high efficiency such as CFL and LED lamps. A comparative study is developed and the authors proposed solutions for such buildings and this study can be applied on a bigger scale for all building sectors in Lebanon. This study is the first study that compares different lighting technologies applied on a real building which is a school in Lebanon and it can be applied and generalized to all buildings in all sectors. Aims: The aim of this study is to compare different technologies used for lighting system such as fluorescent, Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL), and LED installed in schools and universities in the third world especially in Lebanon and their impact on the economy of the country and the environment. This study emphasizes the important of the installation of LED technology in such buildings and its positive impact on the economy of the country and for many reasons developed in this paper.Study Design: This study is developed using the software Dialux for lighting calculation and comparison between different technologies.Place and Duration of Study: This study was made by the first author in a technical school (public school) in Hammana in Lebanon during the year 2014 using real measurements on site and using lighting software “Dialux” in order to compare different types of technologies. Methodology: Real measurements were taken for the lighting load from private generator 60kVA and from power authority (EDL) for the existing lighting system (In the public school). The first author studied the distribution of lighting points for other technologies for the same lux level in each room. The calculation of the predicted load is done and a comparative table that shows different indicators for each technology and final the study is generalized for all schools and universities in Lebanon. The generalized study shows important results on the scale of the country in which the replacement of fluorescent lamps by LED lamps is enough to close 1.5 thermal power plants of the size 35MW in Tyre (south Lebanon) and to economize 2.16% of the total power consumption on the Lebanese scale. Results: The replacement of fluorescent lamps (2x36W) by LED lamps as indicated in this paper will reduce the total power consumption on the Lebanese scale of 48.81 MW (2.16% from total power generated in Lebanon), the saved Energy is 52712.85 MWh/year, saved emission of CO2 from Fuel Oil is 35317.71 Ton of CO2/year, saved fuel consumption from private generators is 36990 liters/day (6,658,200 liters/year), saved cost of maintenance is 767,181$/year, Reduced Cost of electricity and maintenance is 8,955,141$/year, etc.Conclusion: In this paper, the first author presents a comparative study between four different types of lamps (fluorescent 2x36W, CFL of type Philips, CFL of type Arcluce, LED of type ASTRA). This study emphasize the important of doing calculation using “DIALUX” software before selec
机译:在第三世界的国家(如黎巴嫩)(本文案例)中,组织,学校,研究所,大学等正在寻求尽可能节省诸如光源,设备和其他电气设备之类的电气系统的安装价格。没有考虑到电费对此类设备的巨大影响,也没有考虑到环境影响,例如二氧化碳,有毒气体,汞的排放以及高昂的燃料成本。这种想法在黎巴嫩广泛传播,因为大多数所有者和投资者都希望安装最便宜的材料,以便尽可能降低投资成本,而又不考虑此类设备的未来影响,即使他们知道这些设备对未来的影响也很大。电费和环境。在本文中,作者将讨论荧光灯的安装,特别是在学校和大学中,以及如何用高效率的其他灯(例如CFL和LED灯)替换这些灯。进行了一项比较研究,作者提出了此类建筑的解决方案,并且该研究可以更大规模地应用于黎巴嫩的所有建筑领域。这项研究是第一个比较不同照明技术应用于真实建筑物的研究,该建筑物是黎巴嫩的一所学校,可以应用于和推广到各个领域的所有建筑物。目的:本研究的目的是比较安装在第三世界(尤其是黎巴嫩)的学校和大学中的照明系统使用的不同技术,例如荧光灯,紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)和LED,及其对该国经济的影响和环境。这项研究强调了在此类建筑物中安装LED技术的重要性及其对国家经济的积极影响,并且出于多种原因而进行了研究。研究设计:本研究是使用Dialux软件进行的照明计算和比较之间的比较。研究的地点和时间:这项研究是由第一位作者于2014年在黎巴嫩哈马纳的一所技术学校(公立学校)中进行的,该研究使用了现场的实际测量结果并使用了照明软件“ Dialux”以比较不同的技术类型。方法:对私人发电机60kVA和电力局(EDL)现有照明系统(在公立学校中)的照明负载进行了实际测量。第一作者研究了在每个房间中相同勒克斯水平的其他技术的照明点的分布。完成了预计负荷的计算,并提供了一个比较表,该表显示了每种技术的不同指标,并且最终对黎巴嫩的所有学校和大学进行了这项研究。广义研究表明,在该国的规模上,重要的结果是,用LED灯替代荧光灯足以关闭1.5座轮胎(黎巴嫩南部)的35MW规模的热电厂,并节省总能耗的2.16%在黎巴嫩范围内。结果:如本文所述,用LED灯替换荧光灯(2x36W)将在黎巴嫩范围内减少总电力消耗48.81 MW(占黎巴嫩总发电量的2.16%),节省的能源为52712.85 MWh /年,从燃料油中节省的二氧化碳排放量为35317.71吨二氧化碳/年,从私人发电机中节省的燃料消耗量为36990升/天(6,658,200升/年),节省的维护成本为767,181 $ /年,降低了电力和维护成本结论是:8,955,141 $ /年,等等。结论:本文第一作者对四种不同类型的灯(荧光2x36W,Philips型CFL,Arcluce型CFL,ASTRA型LED)进行了比较研究。这项研究强调了在选择之前使用“ DIALUX”软件进行计算的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号