首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Potential Environmental Impacts from the Metals in Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL), and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Bulbs
【24h】

Potential Environmental Impacts from the Metals in Incandescent, Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL), and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Bulbs

机译:白炽灯,紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)和发光二极管(LED)灯泡中的金属可能对环境造成的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Artificial lighting systems are transitioning from incandescent to compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs in response to the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act and the EU Ecodesign Directive, which leads to energy savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Although CFLs and LEDs are more energy-efficient than incandescent bulbs, they require more metal-containing components. There is uncertainty about the potential environmental impacts of these components and whether special provisions must be made for their disposal at the end of useful life. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the resource depletion and toxicity potentials from the metals in incandescent, CFL, and LED bulbs to complement the development of sustainable energy policy. We assessed the potentials by examining whether the lighting products are to be categorized as hazardous waste under existing U.S. federal and California state regulations and by applying life cycle impact-based and hazard-based assessment methods (note that "life cycle impact-based method" does not mean a general life cycle assessment (LCA) but rather the elements in LCA used to quantify toxicity potentials). We discovered that both CFL and LED bulbs are categorized as hazardous, due to excessive levels of lead (Pb) teachability (132 and 44 mg/L, respectively; regulatory limit: 5) and the high contents of copper (111000 and 31 600 mg/kg, respectively; limit: 2500), lead (3860 mg/kg for the CFL bulb; limit: 1000), and zinc (34 500 mg/kg for the CFL bulb; limit: 5000), while the incandescent bulb is not hazardous (note that the results for CFL bulbs excluded mercury vapor not captured during sample preparation). The CFLs and LEDs have higher resource depletion and toxicity potentials than the incandescent bulb due primarily to their high aluminum, copper, gold, lead, silver, and zinc. Comparing the bulbs on an equivalent quantity basis with respect to the expected lifetimes of the bulbs, the CFLs and LEDs have 3-26 and 2-3 times higher potential impacts than the incandescent bulb, respectively. We conclude that in addition to enhancing energy efficiency, conservation and sustainability policies should focus on the development of technologies that reduce the content of hazardous and rare metals in lighting products without compromising their performance and useful lifespan.
机译:为了响应美国《能源独立与安全法》和欧盟《生态设计指令》,人造照明系统正在从白炽灯过渡到紧凑型荧光灯(CFL)和发光二极管(LED)灯泡,从而节省了能源并减少了温室气体排放。尽管CFL和LED比白炽灯泡更节能,但它们需要更多的含金属组件。这些组件的潜在环境影响以及是否必须对使用寿命终止时的处置做出特殊规定尚不确定。因此,本研究的目的是分析白炽灯,CFL和LED灯泡中金属的资源消耗和毒性潜力,以补充可持续能源政策的发展。我们通过检查照明产品是否根据现有的美国联邦和加利福尼亚州法规归类为危险废物,并通过应用基于生命周期影响和基于危害的评估方法(请注意“基于生命周期影响的方法”)来评估潜力并不意味着一般的生命周期评估(LCA),而是LCA中用于量化潜在毒性的元素)。我们发现,CFL和LED灯泡均归因于铅(Pb)示教度过高(分别为132和44 mg / L;法规限制:5)和高铜含量(111000和31 600 mg),被归类为危险灯泡/ kg;限制:2500),铅(CFL灯泡为3860 mg / kg;限制:1000)和锌(CFL灯泡为34 500 mg / kg;限制:5000),而白炽灯泡不是危险(请注意,CFL灯泡的结果排除了样品制备期间未捕获的汞蒸气)。与白炽灯泡相比,CFL和LED具有更高的资源消耗和毒性潜力,这主要是由于它们的铝,铜,金,铅,银和锌含量较高。就灯泡的预期寿命而言,以等量的灯泡进行比较,CFL和LED的潜在影响分别是白炽灯泡的3-26和2-3倍。我们得出的结论是,除了提高能源效率外,保护和可持续性政策还应侧重于开发在不损害其性能和使用寿命的前提下,减少照明产品中有害和稀有金属含量的技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2013年第2期|1040-1047|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon 200-701,South Korea;

    School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, California, United States;

    School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, California, United States,Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, California, United States;

    Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:01:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号