首页> 外文期刊>Cancer control : >Familiarity of general practitioners with Q fever decreases hospitalisation risk
【24h】

Familiarity of general practitioners with Q fever decreases hospitalisation risk

机译:熟悉Q发热的全科医生降低住院风险

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Between 2007 and 2010, the Netherlands experienced large outbreaks of Q fever with over 4000 cases. There were unexplained geographical differences in hospitalisation rates of notified patients. We examined the extent of this geographic variation in Q fever hospitalisation and its potential association with general practitioner (GP) experience with Q fever. Methods: We included Q fever cases notified by GPs in 2008 and 2009 in the affected public health region. We used linear regression to describe trends of hospitalisation over time and tested for statistical differences in hospitalisation between municipalities with the chi-square test. We used the number of previously diagnosed Q fever cases of an individual GP as a proxy for Q fever experience, grouped into four categories of GP experience (1; 2; 3-7 and 8 or more cases). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) using logistic regression, taking into account clustering at the GP level. Results: The proportion of hospitalised cases was highly variable between municipalities (range 0-56%, p-value < 0.001). The proportion of hospitalised cases decreased monthly by 0.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-1.3%). The risk of hospitalisation was lower when GPs had seen eight or more Q fever cases compared with GPs who had seen only one case (OR 0.4 [95% CI: 0.2-0.8]). Discussion: Our findings suggest that increased GP experience was associated with a reduction in hospitalisations. This supports the public health initiatives to disseminate epidemiological updates and information regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options for Q fever to GPs to reduce Q fever related hospitalisation.
机译:简介:在2007年至2010年之间,荷兰经历了4000多例Q病大爆发。通知患者的住院率存在无法解释的地理差异。我们检查了Q发热住院患者中这种地理差异的程度及其与Q发热的全科医生(GP)经验的潜在关联。方法:我们纳入了2008年和2009年由GP通报的受影响公共卫生地区的Q发热病例。我们使用线性回归描述随时间推移的住院趋势,并使用卡方检验测试了各市之间住院的统计差异。我们使用先前诊断过的单个GP的Q发热病例数作为Q发热经验的代表,分为四类GP经验(1、2、3-7和8个或更多病例)。考虑到GP级别的聚类,我们使用logistic回归计算了调整后的优势比(OR)。结果:各市之间住院病例的比例差异很大(范围为0-56%,p值<0.001)。住院病例的比例每月减少0.7%(95%置信区间(CI):0.03-1.3%)。与仅看过一例的全科医生相比,全科医生看过八例或更多的Q发热病例的住院风险较低(OR 0.4 [95%CI:0.2-0.8])。讨论:我们的发现表明,全科医生经验的增加与住院次数的减少有关。这支持公共卫生计划向全科医生传播流行病学更新和有关Q发烧的诊断和治疗选择的信息,以减少Q发烧相关的住院治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号