...
首页> 外文期刊>Californian Journal of Health Promotion >The Effects of Six Weeks of Balance and Strength Training on Measures of Dynamic Balance of Older Adults
【24h】

The Effects of Six Weeks of Balance and Strength Training on Measures of Dynamic Balance of Older Adults

机译:六周的平衡和力量训练对老年人动态平衡的影响

获取原文

摘要

This study examined the effects of six weeks of strength training, balance training, and a combination of both on dynamic balance in older adults. Fifty-one seniors (17 males and 34 females) between the ages of 60 and 93 years (73.2 + 7.9 yrs) participated. Four groups, three treatment groups [strength training (ST), balance training (BT), and a group which combined strength and balance training (SAB)] and a control group (Control), were tested on measures of dynamic balance, strength, and flexibility before (pre-test) and after six weeks of exercise training (post-test). Measures of dynamic balance included the 8-Foot-Up and Go Test and the combined score on the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB-Scale). Lower and upper body strength and flexibility were assessed using components of the Senior Fitness Test (chair stand, arm curl, sit and reach, and back scratch test). A repeated measure MANCOVA showed no significant differences between groups for measures of dynamic balance. Repeated measure ANOVA's with Post Hoc comparisons indicated upper body strength and lower body flexibility increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the ST and SAB group while upper body flexibility decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in the ST group compared to all other groups. Although all treatment groups exhibited a trend for improvement, results suggest six weeks of exercise training, regardless of type, was not sufficient to elicit significant changes in dynamic balance in the present sample of older adults
机译:这项研究检查了六周的力量训练,平衡训练以及两者的结合对老年人动态平衡的影响。年龄在60至93岁(73.2 + 7.9岁)之间的51位老年人(男性17位,女性34位)参加了比赛。测试了四组,三个治疗组[力量训练(ST),平衡训练(BT),以及力量与平衡训练(SAB)组合的组]和对照组(Control)的动态平衡,力量,和灵活性(测试前)和运动训练后六周(测试后)。动平衡的衡量标准包括8步上进高出测试和Fullerton Advanced Balance量表(FAB量表)的综合得分。下半身和上半身的力量和柔韧性使用高级体能测试(椅子站立,手臂弯曲,坐直和伸直和背部划伤测试)的组件进行评估。重复测量的MANCOVA在动态平衡的测量之间没有显着差异。重复测量的ANOVA与Post Hoc比较表明,与所有其他组相比,ST和SAB组的上身力量和下身柔韧性显着提高(p <0.05),而ST组的上身柔韧性显着降低(p <0.05)。尽管所有治疗组均表现出改善的趋势,但结果表明,无论哪种类型,六周的运动训练都不足以引起当前老年人样本动态平衡的显着变化

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号