首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos de Saúde Pública >Repensando os desafios de Ulisses a Fausto: a saúde, o indivíduo e a história
【24h】

Repensando os desafios de Ulisses a Fausto: a saúde, o indivíduo e a história

机译:重新思考《尤利西斯》对《浮士德》的挑战:健康,个人和历史

获取原文
       

摘要

Concentrating on two historical synecdoches, Ulysses and Faust, this article takes up the etymology of the Latin term salute as a unit lying somewhere between "existential needs" and "especially human needs", leading to the challenge of satisfying the need for "conservation of life" and at the same time to "surpass it, go beyond it". Both meanings are present in Ulysses’ attitude of not succumbing to the siren’s melody and in Faust’s desire to rise above everyday life. Some aspects of the Marxist conception of the philosophy of history and Althusser’s Structuralist Marxism are criticized. Also, in light of Marxist-Hellerian theory, the article analyzes the hypothesis that the target of the final reports of the VIII National Health Conference was "particular man" and not the individual, since health is treated only as "an existential need", and does not envisage the generic human. As a theoretical challenge, the text, in search of the unfolding individual, finally recommends the construction of "epistemological sutures" between nature and society, everyday life and universality, and the young and old Marx.
机译:本文着眼于两个历史上的合奏,尤利西斯和浮士德,以拉丁语“敬礼”的词源学为单位,介于“存在的需求”和“特别是人类的需求”之间,从而带来了满足“保护自然资源”需求的挑战。生命”,同时“超越,超越”。这两种含义都体现在尤利西斯(Ulysses)不屈服于警号的旋律的态度中,以及浮士德(Faust)超越日常生活的渴望中。对马克思主义历史哲学观和阿尔都塞的结构主义马克思主义的某些方面提出了批评。此外,根据马克思主义-海勒主义理论,文章分析了以下假设:第八次全国卫生大会最终报告的目标是“特定的人”,而不是个人,因为健康仅被视为“存在的需要”,并没有设想普通人。作为理论上的挑战,本文在寻找不断发展的个体时,最终建议在自然与社会,日常生活与普遍性以及青年与老马克思之间构建“认识论缝合线”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号