首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos de Saúde Pública >Por que a percep??o social é importante durante os surtos de doen?as: observando como os indivíduos entendem o Zika vírus por história de infec??o autorreferidaPor qué la percepción social es importante durante los brotes de enfermedades: cómo los individ
【24h】

Por que a percep??o social é importante durante os surtos de doen?as: observando como os indivíduos entendem o Zika vírus por história de infec??o autorreferidaPor qué la percepción social es importante durante los brotes de enfermedades: cómo los individ

机译:为什么在疾病暴发期间社会认知很重要:通过自我推荐的感染历史来观察个体如何理解寨卡病毒?为什么在疾病暴发期间社会认知很重要:个体如何

获取原文
       

摘要

We respond to the comment to our article Signifying Zika: Heterogeneity in the Representations of the Virus by History of Infection with the goal of reassuring our findings.Our article and supplementary material extensively discussed the limitations of survey data in lieu of biomarkers. However, the key in social health research is whether respondents believe they were infected with Zika virus (ZIKV) and had a positive diagnosis (clinical or serological). Short of directly testing individuals, directly asking them about the source of their diagnosis has been shown to be the most effective methodology for social health analysis 1. Whether or not individuals actually were infected by the virus, our article evaluated their perceptions. There is a well-established empirical and conceptual literature on how risk perceptions and perception of diseases shape behavior 2,3,4,5,6. The Health Belief Model 7, for example, suggests that individual behavior is directly shaped by their perceptions of risk. As such, both objective (serology and clinical exams) and perceived diagnosis have concrete implications on how individuals deal with a disease. Importantly, differences in how individuals perceive their risk of infection have contributed to the effectiveness (or not) of public health campaigns 8. Given the diversity of meanings towards ZIKV, our main finding remains, i.e., we showed that trying to reach the entire Brazilian population using a single message or strategy might not be effective to produce change within groups that capable of or ready to change.
机译:为了回应我们的发现,我们回应了对我们的文章《 Signika Zika:病毒表征中的异质性》的评论,目的是保证我们的发现。我们的文章和补充材料广泛讨论了代替生物标志物的调查数据的局限性。但是,社会卫生研究的关键是受访者是否相信自己感染了寨卡病毒(ZIKV)并得到了肯定的诊断(临床或血清学)。除了直接测试个人,直接询问他们诊断的来源之外,这已被证明是进行社会健康分析的最有效方法。1.无论个人是否实际上被病毒感染,我们的文章都对他们的看法进行了评估。关于风险认知和疾病感知如何影响行为的研究已有成熟的经验和概念文献2,3,4,5,6。例如,“健康信念模型7”表明,个人行为直接取决于他们对风险的看法。因此,客观(血清学和临床检查)和感知的诊断对个人如何应对疾病都有具体的含义。重要的是,人们对感染风险的看法有所不同,这对公共卫生运动的有效性(或没有影响)做出了贡献。8.鉴于对ZIKV含义的多样性,我们的主要发现仍然存在,即,我们表明,试图覆盖整个巴西人使用单一消息或策略的人群可能无法有效地在有能力或已准备好改变的群体中产生改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号