...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Economic evaluation of neonatal care packages in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sylhet, Bangladesh
【24h】

Economic evaluation of neonatal care packages in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sylhet, Bangladesh

机译:在孟加拉国锡尔赫特市进行的一项集群随机对照试验中,对新生儿护理包的经济评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of two strategies for neonatal care in Sylhet division, Bangladesh. Methods In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, two strategies for neonatal care – known as home care and community care – were compared with existing services. For each study arm, economic costs were estimated from a societal perspective, inclusive of programme costs, provider costs and household out-of-pocket payments on care-seeking. Neonatal mortality in each study arm was determined through household surveys. The incremental cost-effectiveness of each strategy – compared with that of the pre-existing levels of maternal and neonatal care – was then estimated. The levels of uncertainty in our estimates were quantified through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Findings The incremental programme costs of implementing the home-care package were 2939 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1833–7616) United States dollars (US$) per neonatal death averted and US$ 103.49 (95% CI: 64.72–265.93) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The corresponding total societal costs were US$ 2971 (95% CI: 1844–7628) and US$ 104.62 (95% CI: 65.15–266.60), respectively. The home-care package was cost-effective – with 95% certainty – if healthy life years were valued above US$ 214 per DALY averted. In contrast, implementation of the community-care strategy led to no reduction in neonatal mortality and did not appear to be cost-effective. Conclusion The home-care package represents a highly cost-effective intervention strategy that should be considered for replication and scale-up in Bangladesh and similar settings elsewhere.
机译:目的评估和比较孟加拉国锡尔赫特(Sylhet)部门两种新生儿护理策略的成本效益。方法在一项整群随机对照试验中,将两种新生儿护理策略(称为家庭护理和社区护理)与现有服务进行了比较。对于每个研究部门,从社会角度估算了经济成本,包括计划成本,提供者成本和寻求护理的家庭自付费用。通过家庭调查确定每个研究组的新生儿死亡率。然后,估计了每种策略的增量成本效益(与先前的母婴保健水平相比)。我们的估计中的不确定性水平是通过概率敏感性分析进行量化的。结果实施家庭护理一揽子计划的增量计划成本为2939(95%置信区间,CI:1833–7616)/每避免新生儿死亡的美元(USD)和103.49(95%CI:64.72-265.93)。每个残疾调整生命年(DALY)。相应的总社会成本分别为2971美元(95%CI:1844–7628)和104.62美元(95%CI:65.15–266.60)。如果健康生命年的价值超过避免的每DALY 214美元,则家庭护理一揽子计划将具有成本效益,并具有95%的确定性。相反,社区护理战略的实施并未降低新生儿死亡率,而且似乎没有成本效益。结论家庭护理方案代表了一种具有高成本效益的干预策略,应该考虑在孟加拉国和其他地方的类似环境中进行复制和扩大规模。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号