...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain and Behavior >Rightward dominance in temporal high‐frequency electrical asymmetry corresponds to higher resting heart rate and lower baroreflex sensitivity in a heterogeneous population
【24h】

Rightward dominance in temporal high‐frequency electrical asymmetry corresponds to higher resting heart rate and lower baroreflex sensitivity in a heterogeneous population

机译:时间高频电不对称中的右方优势对应于异类人群中较高的静息心率和较低的压力反射敏感性

获取原文

摘要

AbstractObjectiveExplore potential use of a temporal lobe electrical asymmetry score to discriminate between sympathetic and parasympathetic tendencies in autonomic cardiovascular regulation.Methods131 individuals (82 women, mean age 43.1, range 13–83) with diverse clinical conditions completed inventories for depressive (CES-D or BDI-II) and insomnia-related (ISI) symptomatology, and underwent five-minute recordings of heart rate and blood pressure, allowing calculation of heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), followed by one-minute, two-channel, eyes-closed scalp recordings of brain electrical activity. A temporal lobe high-frequency (23–36 Hz) electrical asymmetry score was calculated for each subject by subtracting the average amplitude in the left temporal region from amplitude in the right temporal region, and dividing by the lesser of the two.ResultsDepressive and insomnia-related symptomatology exceeding clinical threshold levels were reported by 48% and 50% of subjects, respectively. Using a cutoff value of 5% or greater to define temporal high-frequency asymmetry, subjects with leftward compared to rightward asymmetry were more likely to report use of a sedative-hypnotic medication (42% vs. 22%, P = 0.02). Among subjects with asymmetry of 5% or greater to 30% or greater, those with rightward compared to leftward temporal high-frequency asymmetry had higher resting heart rate (≥5% asymmetry, 72.3 vs. 63.8, P = 0.004; ≥10%, 71.5 vs. 63.0, P = 0.01; ≥20%, 72.2 vs. 64.2, P = 0.05; ≥30%, 71.4 vs. 64.6, P = 0.05). Subjects with larger degrees of rightward compared to leftward temporal high-frequency asymmetry had lower baroreflex sensitivity (≥40% asymmetry, 10.6 vs. 16.4, P = 0.03; ≥50% asymmetry, 10.4 vs. 16.7, P = 0.05).ConclusionIn a heterogeneous population, individuals with rightward compared to leftward temporal high-frequency electrical asymmetry had higher resting heart rate and lower BRS. Two-channel recording of brain electrical activity from bilateral temporal regions appears to hold promise for further investigation as a means to assess cortical activity associated with autonomic cardiovascular regulation.
机译:摘要目的探索利用颞叶电不对称性评分来区分自主性心血管调节中的交感和副交感倾向的方法。方法131名具有各种临床状况的女性(82名女性,平均年龄43.1,范围13-83)完成了抑郁症调查问卷(CES-D或BDI-II)和失眠相关(ISI)症状,并进行了五分钟的心率和血压记录,从而可以计算出心率变异性和压力反射敏感性(BRS),然后是一分钟,两通道,双眼脑电活动的头皮记录。通过从右侧颞骨区域的振幅中减去左侧颞骨区域的平均振幅,再除以两者中的较小者,计算出每个受试者的颞叶高频(23-36Hz)电不对称分数。分别有48%和50%的受试者报告了超过临床阈值水平的相关症状。使用5%或更高的临界值定义时间高频不对称性,与向右不对称相比向左不对称的受试者更有可能报告使用镇静催眠药(42%对22%,P = 0.02)。在不对称度为5%或更大至30%或更高的受试者中,与向左时态的高频不对称受试者相比,向右的受试者具有更高的静息心率(≥5%的不对称性,分别为72.3和63.8,P = 0.004;≥10%, 71.5 vs.63.0,P = 0.01;≥20%,72.2 vs.64.2,P = 0.05;≥30%,71.4 vs.64.6,P = 0.05)。与向左颞部高频高频不对称相比,向右度较大的受试者的压力反射敏感性较低(≥40%不对称,10.6比16.4,P = 0.03;≥50%不对称,10.4比16.7,P = 0.05)。异类人群,与向左的人相比,向左的人在时间上的高频高频电不对称性具有更高的静息心率和更低的BRS。来自双侧颞区的脑电活动的两通道记录似乎有望为进一步研究作为评估与自主性心血管调节相关的皮层活动的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号