...
首页> 外文期刊>Autonomic neuroscience: basic & clinical >Skeletal muscle electrical stimulation improves baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in heart failure rats
【24h】

Skeletal muscle electrical stimulation improves baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in heart failure rats

机译:骨骼肌电刺激改善心力衰竭大鼠的压力反射敏感性和心率变异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) on the arterial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and cardiovascular autonomic control in rats with chronic heart failure (CHF). Male Wistar rats were designated to one of four groups: placebo sham (P-Sham, n = 9), ES sham (ES-Sham, n = 9), placebo CHF (P-CHF, n = 9) or ES CHF (ES-CHF, n = 9). The ES was adjusted at a low frequency (30 Hz), duration of 250 ps, with hold and rest time of 8s (4 weeks, 30 min/day, 5 times/week). It was applied on the gastrocrtemius muscle with intensity to produce a visible muscle contraction. The rats assigned to the placebo groups performed the same procedures with the equipment turned off. The two-way ANOVA and the post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P < 0.05) were used to data comparison. The BRS was higher in ES-Sham group compared to the P-Sham group and the ES-CHF group compared to the P-CHF group. ES was able to decrease heart rate sympatho-vagal modulation and peripheral sympathetic modulation in ES-CHF compared to P-CHF group. Interestingly, heart rate sympatho-vagal modulation was similar between ES-CHF and P-Sham groups. Thus, ES enhances heart rate parasympathetic modulation on heart failure (ES-CHF) compared to placebo (P-CHF), with consequent decrease of sympatho-vagal balance in the ES-CHF group compared to the P-CHF. The results show that a 4 week ES protocol in CHF rats enhances arterial BRS and cardiovascular autonomic control. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究的目的是评估电刺激(ES)对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)大鼠的动脉压力反射敏感性(BRS)和心血管自主控制的影响。将雄性Wistar大鼠指定为四组之一:安慰剂假手术(P-Sham,n = 9),ES假手术(ES-Sham,n = 9),安慰剂CHF(P-CHF,n = 9)或ES CHF( ES-CHF,n = 9)。将ES调整为低频(30 Hz),持续时间为250 ps,保持和休息时间为8s(4周,30分钟/天,5次/周)。将其强度施加在腓肠肌上以产生可见的肌肉收缩。分配给安慰剂组的大鼠在关闭设备的情况下执行相同的步骤。双向ANOVA和事后Student-Newman-Keuls检验(P <0.05)用于数据比较。与P-Sham组相比,ES-Sham组的BRS更高,与P-CHF组相比,ES-CHF组的BRS更高。与P-CHF组相比,ES能够降低ES-CHF的心率交感迷走神经调节和周围交感调节。有趣的是,ES-CHF和P-Sham组之间的心率交感迷走神经调制相似。因此,与安慰剂(P-CHF)相比,ES增强了心力衰竭对心率的副交感神经调节(ES-CHF),因此与P-CHF相比,ES-CHF组的交感迷走神经平衡降低。结果表明,在CHF大鼠中进行为期4周的ES方案可增强动脉BRS和心血管自主控制。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号