...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:针对中低收入国家精神分裂症患者的社区心理社会干预:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

There is consensus that the treatment of schizophrenia should combine anti-psychotic medication and psychosocial interventions in order to address complex social, economic and health needs. It is recommended that family therapy or support; community-based rehabilitation; and/or self-help and support groups should be provided for people with schizophrenia in low and middle-income countries. The effectiveness of community-based psychosocial interventions in these settings is unclear. Studies evaluating community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia?were identified through database searching up to April 2016. Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared the intervention group with a control group receiving treatment as usual including medication. Only studies set in low and middle-income countries were included.?Random effects meta-analyses were performed separately for each intervention type. Eleven randomised controlled trials in five middle-income countries were identified, with a total of 1580 participants. The content of included interventions varied from single-faceted psychoeducational interventions, to multi-component rehabilitation-focused interventions, to case management interventions. A third of the included studies did not incorporate any community involvement in the intervention. The quality of evidence was often low. Amongst the seven studies that reported on symptom severity up to 18?months post intervention, the pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) across all intervention types was 0.95 (95% CI 0.28, 1.61; P 0.005; I 2?=?95%; n?=?862), representing a strong effect. A strong effect on symptom severity remained after excluding two studies with a high risk of bias (SMD 0.80; 95% CI 0.07, 1.53; P 0.03; I 2?=?94%; n?=?676). Community-based psychosocial interventions may also have beneficial impacts on functioning (SMD 1.12; 95% CI 0.25, 2.00; P 0.01; I 2?=?94%; n?=?511) and reducing hospital readmissions (SMD 0.68; 95% CI 0.27, 1.09; P 0.001; I2?=?33%; n?=?167). The limited evidence from low and middle-income countries supports the feasibility and effectiveness of community-based psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia, even in the absence of community mobilisation. Community-based psychosocial interventions should therefore be provided in these settings as an adjuvant service in addition to facility-based care for people with schizophrenia.
机译:人们一致认为,精神分裂症的治疗应结合抗精神病药物和社会心理干预措施,以解决复杂的社会,经济和健康需求。建议家庭治疗或支持;社区康复;应为中低收入国家的精神分裂症患者提供自助和/或自助小组。在这些情况下,基于社区的社会心理干预的有效性尚不清楚。截止到2016年4月,通过数据库搜索确定了评估针对精神分裂症患者的社区心理社会干预措施的研究。如果将干预组与接受常规治疗(包括药物治疗)的对照组进行比较,则包括随机对照试验。仅包括在低收入和中等收入国家开展的研究。针对每种干预类型分别进行随机效应荟萃分析。确定了五个中等收入国家的11项随机对照试验,共有1580名参与者。包括的干预措施的内容从单方面的心理教育干预措施到以康复为重点的多方面干预措施,再到病例管理干预措施不等。纳入的研究中有三分之一没有在干预措施中纳入任何社区参与。证据质量通常很低。在七项报告了干预后18个月以内的症状严重程度的研究中,所有干预类型的合并标准平均差(SMD)为0.95(95%CI 0.28,1.61; P 0.005; I 2?=?95%; n?=?862),表示很强的效果。在排除两项偏倚风险高的研究后,对症状严重性的影响仍然很强(SMD 0.80; 95%CI 0.07,1.53; P 0.03; I2α=?94%; n?=?676)。基于社区的社会心理干预措施也可能对功能产生有益影响(SMD 1.12; 95%CI 0.25,2.00; P 0.01; I 2?=?94%; n?=?511)和减少住院率(SMD 0.68; 95% CI 0.27,1.09; P 0.001; I 2 = 33%; n = 167。来自中低收入国家的证据有限,即使没有社区动员,也支持以社区为基础的精神分裂症心理干预的可行性和有效性。因此,除了为精神分裂症患者提供基于设施的护理外,在这些情况下还应提供基于社区的社会心理干预作为辅助服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号