首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Depression and anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence rates based on a comparison of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the hospital, Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
【24h】

Depression and anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence rates based on a comparison of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the hospital, Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

机译:类风湿关节炎患者的抑郁和焦虑:基于抑郁,焦虑和压力量表(DASS)与医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)的比较的患病率

获取原文
       

摘要

Background While it is recognised that depression is prevalent in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), recent studies have also highlighted significant levels of anxiety in RA patients. This study compared two commonly used scales, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), in relation to their measurement range and cut points to consider the relative prevalence of both constructs, and if prevalence rates may be due to scale-specific case definition. Methods Patients meeting the criteria for RA were recruited in Leeds, UK and Sydney, Australia and asked to complete a survey that included both scales. The data was analysed using the Rasch measurement model. Results A total of 169 RA patients were assessed, with a repeat subsample, resulting in 323 cases for analysis. Both scales met Rasch model expectations. Using the 'possible+probable' cut point from the HADS, 58.3% had neither anxiety nor depression; 13.5% had anxiety only; 6.4% depression only and 21.8% had both 'possible+probable' anxiety and depression. Cut points for depression were comparable across the two scales while a lower cut point for anxiety in the DASS was required to equate prevalence. Conclusions This study provides further support for high prevalence of depression and anxiety in RA. It also shows that while these two scales provide a good indication of possible depression and anxiety, the estimates of prevalence so derived could vary, particularly for anxiety. These findings are discussed in terms of comparisons across studies and selection of scales for clinical use.
机译:背景技术尽管人们公认类风湿关节炎(RA)中普遍存在抑郁症,但最近的研究也突出了RA患者的焦虑水平。这项研究比较了两个常用的量表,即抑郁焦虑量表和压力量表(DASS)和医院焦虑量表和抑郁量表(HADS)的测量范围和切入点,以考虑两种结构的相对患病率,以及患病率可能是由于特定规模的案例定义所致。方法在英国利兹和澳大利亚悉尼招募符合RA标准的患者,要求他们完成包括这两个量表的调查。使用Rasch测量模型分析数据。结果总共评估了169名RA患者,并进行了重复抽样,共分析323例。两种量表均符合Rasch模型的预期。根据HADS的“可能+可能”切入点,58.3%的人既没有焦虑也没有抑郁。 13.5%只有焦虑;仅6.4%的抑郁症和21.8%的人既有“可能+可能”的焦虑和抑郁感。抑郁的临界点在两个量表上是可比的,而DASS中焦虑的较低临界点需要与患病率相等。结论这项研究为RA的高患病率和焦虑症提供了进一步的支持。它还表明,尽管这两个量表很好地表明了可能的抑郁和焦虑,但由此得出的患病率估计值可能会有所不同,尤其是对于焦虑症。这些研究结果通过研究比较和临床使用量表的选择进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号