首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Emotional crisis in a naturalistic context: characterizing outpatient profiles and treatment effectiveness
【24h】

Emotional crisis in a naturalistic context: characterizing outpatient profiles and treatment effectiveness

机译:自然主义背景下的情感危机:表征门诊概况和治疗效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Crisis happens daily yet its understanding is often limited, even in the field of psychiatry. Indeed, a challenge is to assess the potential for change of patients so as to offer appropriate therapeutic interventions and enhance treatment program efficacy. This naturalistic study aimed to identify the socio-demographical characteristics and clinical profiles at admission of patients referred to a specialized Crisis Intervention Center (CIC) and to examine the effectiveness of the intervention. Method The sample was composed of 352 adult outpatients recruited among the referrals to the CIC. Assessment completed at admission and at discharge examined psychiatric symptoms, defense mechanisms, recovery styles and global functioning. The crisis intervention consisted in a psychodynamically oriented multimodal approach associated with medication. Results Regarding the clinical profiles at intake, patients were middle-aged (M?=?38.56, SD?=?10.91), with a higher proportion of women (62.22%). They were addressed to the CIC because they had attempted to commit suicide or had suicidal ideation or presented depressed mood related to interpersonal difficulties. No statistical differences were found between patients dropping out ( n =?215) and those attending the crisis intervention ( n =?137). Crisis intervention demonstrated a beneficial effect ( p Conclusions This study establishes the profile of patients referred to the CIC and shows that more than half of the patients dropped out from the crisis intervention before completion. Our findings suggest that people presenting an emotional crisis benefit from crisis intervention. However, given methodological constraints, these results need to be considered with caution. Moreover, the clinical significance of the improvements is not confirmed. Thus, the effectiveness of crisis intervention in naturalistic context is not fully determined and should be more rigorously studied in future research.
机译:背景危机每天都在发生,但即使在精神病学领域,其理解也常常受到限制。确实,挑战在于评估患者改变的可能性,以提供适当的治疗干预并增强治疗程序的有效性。这项自然研究旨在确定入院患者的社会人口统计学特征和临床特征,并转交给专门的危机干预中心(CIC),并检查干预措施的有效性。方法该样本由352名在CIC转诊中招募的成人门诊患者组成。入院和出院时完成的评估检查了精神症状,防御机制,恢复方式和整体功能。危机干预包括与药物治疗相关的面向心理动力学的多模式方法。结果就摄入时的临床情况而言,患者为中年(M≥38.56,SD≥10.91),女性比例较高(62.22%)。他们之所以向CIC寻求帮助,是因为他们曾试图自杀或有自杀念头,或表现出与人际交往困难有关的沮丧情绪。在辍学的患者(n = 215)和参加危机干预的患者(n = 137)之间没有发现统计学差异。危机干预显示出了有益的效果(p结论本研究建立了被称为CIC的患者概况,并显示超过一半的患者在完成治疗之前退出了危机干预。我们的发现表明,存在情感危机的人们将从危机中受益但是,由于方法上的限制,这些结果必须谨慎考虑,而且,改进的临床意义尚未得到证实,因此,危机干预在自然主义背景下的有效性尚未得到充分确定,应在此方面进行更严格的研究。未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号