首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy in the outpatient treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy in the outpatient treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial

机译:抑郁症的门诊治疗中的认知行为疗法与短期心理动力支持心理疗法的比较:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Previous research has shown that Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy (SPSP) is an effective alternative to pharmacotherapy and combined treatment (SPSP and pharmacotherapy) in the treatment of depressed outpatients. The question remains, however, how Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy compares with other established psychotherapy methods. The present study compares Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy to the evidence-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in terms of acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in the outpatient treatment of depression. Moreover, this study aims to identify clinical predictors that can distinguish patients who may benefit from either of these treatments in particular. This article outlines the study protocol. The results of the study, which is being currently carried out, will be presented as soon as they are available. Methods/Design Adult outpatients with a main diagnosis of major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified according to DSM-IV criteria and mild to severe depressive symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 14) are randomly allocated to Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Both treatments are individual psychotherapies consisting of 16 sessions within 22 weeks. Assessments take place at baseline (week 0), during the treatment period (week 5 and 10) and at treatment termination (week 22). In addition, a follow-up assessment takes place one year after treatment start (week 52). Primary outcome measures are the number of patients refusing treatment (acceptability); the number of patients terminating treatment prematurely (feasibility); and the severity of depressive symptoms (efficacy) according to an independent rater, the clinician and the patient. Secondary outcome measures include general psychopathology, general psychotherapy outcome, pain, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Clinical predictors of treatment outcome include demographic variables, psychiatric symptoms, cognitive and psychological patient characteristics and the quality of the therapeutic relationship. Discussion This study evaluates Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy as a treatment for depressed outpatients by comparing it to the established evidence-based treatment Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Specific strengths of this study include its strong external validity and the clinical relevance of its research aims. Limitations of the study are discussed. Trial registration Current Controlled Trails ISRCTN31263312
机译:背景技术先前的研究表明,短期心理动力支持心理治疗(SPSP)是治疗抑郁症门诊病人的有效替代药物治疗和联合治疗(SPSP和药物治疗)的方法。然而,问题仍然在于,短期心理动力支持心理治疗与其他既定的心理治疗方法相比如何。本研究在抑郁症的门诊治疗的可接受性,可行性和有效性方面,将短期心理动力支持心理疗法与基于证据的认知行为疗法进行了比较。此外,本研究旨在确定可区分可能从这两种治疗中特别受益的患者的临床预测指标。本文概述了研究方案。目前正在执行的研究结果将在可用时立即提供。方法/设计将主要诊断为重度抑郁症或未按DSM-IV标准另行指定,轻度至重度抑郁症状(汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分≥14)的成人门诊患者随机分配至短期心理动力支持性心理治疗或认知行为疗法。两种治疗都是单独的心理治疗,包括22周内的16次疗程。评估在基线(第0周),治疗期间(第5和10周)和治疗终止(第22周)进行。此外,治疗开始后一年(第52周)进行了随访评估。主要结果指标是拒绝治疗的患者人数(可接受性);提前终止治疗的患者人数(可行性);以及独立评估者,临床医生和患者的抑郁症状(疗效)的严重性。次要结局指标包括一般精神病理学,一般心理治疗结局,疼痛,与健康相关的生活质量和成本效益。治疗结果的临床预测指标包括人口统计学变量,精神症状,患者的认知和心理特征以及治疗关系的质量。讨论本研究通过将其与已建立的循证治疗认知行为疗法进行比较,评估了短期心理动力支持心理疗法作为抑郁症门诊病人的治疗方法。这项研究的特殊优势包括其强大的外部有效性和其研究目的的临床意义。讨论了研究的局限性。试用注册电流控制路径ISRCTN31263312

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号