...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Prospective cohort study of the relationship between neuro-cognition, social cognition and violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
【24h】

Prospective cohort study of the relationship between neuro-cognition, social cognition and violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

机译:法医精神分裂症和精神分裂症患者神经认知,社会认知与暴力之间关系的前瞻性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is a broad literature suggesting that cognitive difficulties are associated with violence across a variety of groups. Although neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are core features of schizophrenia, evidence of a relationship between cognitive impairments and violence within this patient population has been mixed. Methods We prospectively examined whether neurocognition and social cognition predicted inpatient violence amongst patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (n?=?89; 10 violent) over a 12?month period. Neurocognition and social cognition were assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Results Using multivariate analysis neurocognition and social cognition variables could account for 34?% of the variance in violent incidents after controlling for age and gender. Scores on a social cognitive reasoning task (MSCEIT) were significantly lower for the violent compared to nonviolent group and produced the largest effect size. Mediation analysis showed that the relationship between neurocognition and violence was completely mediated by each of the following variables independently: social cognition (MSCEIT), symptoms (PANSS Total Score), social functioning (SOFAS) and violence proneness (HCR-20 Total Score). There was no evidence of a serial pathway between neurocognition and multiple mediators and violence, and only social cognition and violence proneness operated in parallel as significant mediators accounting for 46?% of the variance in violent incidents. There was also no evidence that neurocogniton mediated the relationship between any of these variables and violence. Conclusions Of all the predictors examined, neurocognition was the only variable whose effects on violence consistently showed evidence of mediation. Neurocognition operates as a distal risk factor mediated through more proximal factors. Social cognition in contrast has a direct effect on violence independent of neurocognition, violence proneness and symptom severity. The neurocognitive impairment experienced by patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders may create the foundation for the emergence of a range of risk factors for violence including deficits in social reasoning, symptoms, social functioning, and HCR-20 risk items, which in turn are causally related to violence.
机译:背景技术有大量文献表明,认知障碍与各个群体的暴力行为有关。尽管神经认知和社会认知缺陷是精神分裂症的核心特征,但该患者人群中认知障碍和暴力之间的关系的证据好坏参半。方法我们前瞻性地研究了神经认知和社会认知是否可以预测精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍(n = 89; 10暴力)患者在12个月内的住院暴力。使用MATRICS共识认知电池(MCCB)评估神经认知和社交认知。结果使用多变量分析,在控制了年龄和性别之后,神经认知和社会认知变量可占暴力事件方差的34%。与非暴力组相比,暴力组的社会认知推理任务(MSCEIT)得分要低得多,并且产生的影响最大。中介分析表明,神经认知和暴力之间的关系完全由以下变量独立地介导:社会认知(MSCEIT),症状(PANSS总分),社会功能(SOFAS)和暴力倾向(HCR-20总分)。没有证据表明神经认知与多种介体和暴力之间存在连续的途径,只有社会认知和暴力倾向同时作为重要介体同时起作用,占暴力事件方差的46%。也没有证据表明神经认知介导了这些变量与暴力之间的关系。结论在所检查的所有预测变量中,神经认知是唯一变量,其对暴力的影响始终显示出调解的证据。神经认知是由更多近端因素介导的远端危险因素。相反,社交认知对暴力有直接影响,而与神经认知,暴力倾向和症状严重程度无关。精神分裂症谱系障碍患者经历的神经认知障碍可能为出现一系列暴力危险因素奠定基础,包括社交推理,症状,社交功能和HCR-20风险项的缺陷,而这些风险因果关系到暴力。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号