...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Quetiapine augmentation of SRIs in treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study [ISRCTN83050762]
【24h】

Quetiapine augmentation of SRIs in treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study [ISRCTN83050762]

机译:喹硫平增强SRI治疗难治性强迫症:一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照研究[ISRCTN83050762]

获取原文

摘要

Background Although serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective in the treatment of OCD, many patients fail to respond to these agents. Growing evidence from open-label and placebo-controlled trials suggests a role for augmentation of SRIs with atypical antipsychotics in OCD. Quetiapine is generally well tolerated and previous open-label data has produced mixed results in OCD and additional controlled data is needed. Methods We undertook a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine augmentation in subjects who had responded inadequately to open-label treatment with an SRI for 12 weeks. Following informed consent and screening, forty-two subjects were randomised to either placebo or quetiapine for six weeks. Results There was significant improvement from baseline to endpoint on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale in both the quetiapine and placebo groups (quetiapine, n = 20, p Conclusions In this study, quetiapine augmentation was no more effective than placebo augmentation of SRIs. A number of limitations in study design make comparisons with previous studies in this area difficult and probably contributed to our negative findings. Future work in this important clinical area should address these limitations.
机译:背景技术尽管血清素再摄取抑制剂可有效治疗OCD,但许多患者对这些药物无反应。来自开放标签和安慰剂对照试验的证据越来越多,表明在强迫症中,非典型抗精神病药可增加SRI的作用。喹硫平通常具有良好的耐受性,以前的开放标签数据在OCD中产生了不同的结果,还需要其他受控数据。方法我们对喹硫平增强治疗对开放标签治疗对SRI的反应不足12周的受试者进行了一项双盲,随机,平行组,灵活剂量,安慰剂对照研究。在知情同意和筛选后,将42名受试者随机分组接受安慰剂或喹硫平治疗6周。结果喹硫平组和安慰剂组的耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表从基线到终点都有显着改善(喹硫平,n = 20,p)结论在这项研究中,喹硫平增加并不比安慰剂增加SRI更有效。研究设计的许多局限性使得与该领域以前的研究进行比较变得困难,并且可能导致了我们的负面发现,这一重要临床领域的未来工作应解决这些局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号