首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
【24h】

A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn

机译:一项随机对照的双盲试验,比较了剖宫产分娩时在两个不同的时间(皮肤切开术前和脐带夹持后)对母亲和新生儿的预防性抗生素头孢唑林的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Caesarean delivery (CD) increases the risk of postpartum infection by 5 to 20 fold. Prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) is the goal of antibiotic prophylaxis. This study was carried out to assess the optimum timing for prophylactic antibiotic administration and to assess the amount of the antibiotic crossing the placental barrier. Methods Eligible mothers were recruited, after informed consent, once the decision for CD was made. Each mother received two injections, one prior to skin incision and one after cord clamping, (one being the study drug Cefazolin, and the other, a placebo) based on the randomization code. Demographic, maternal and neonatal monitoring data until discharge from hospital, and at the 6?weeks postpartum visit were collected. Levels of the prophylactic antibiotic were measured from the cord blood in every 8th neonate. The objective of the study was to compare the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, intravenous Cefazolin 1?g, administered at Caesarean delivery (CD) at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn. The secondary outcomes that were followed up were the number of maternal and neonatal readmissions. An appropriate test for significance, Fisher’s exact test was used to find the association between risk variables and outcome. Results The total numbers of mothers enrolled were 1106, of whom 553 mothers received antibiotic prior to skin incision (pre-incision) and 543 mothers received antibiotic after cord clamping (post-incision). The pre-incision group had significantly less febrile illness (RR?=?0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.80) and SSI (RR?=?0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.53) when compared with the post- incision group. The post-incision group significantly had >7?days hospital stay when compared to the 4-7?days stay of the pre-incision group ( p =?0.005).There were no differences in any of the neonatal outcomes. The quantity of the antibiotic in the cord blood was only 2-3%. Conclusions Pre incision prophylactic antibiotic protected the mother from SSI and febrile illness and decreased the hospital stay significantly. Trial registration The Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) was [ CTRI/2016/03/006710 dated, 04/03/2016].
机译:背景剖腹产(CD)使产后感染的风险增加5到20倍。预防手术部位感染(SSI)是预防抗生素的目标。进行这项研究以评估预防性抗生素给药的最佳时机,并评估穿过胎盘屏障的抗生素的量。方法在做出CD决定后,征得知情同意后,招募合格的母亲。每位母亲根据随机编码接受两次注射,一次是在皮肤切开之前,一次是在脐带夹住之后(一次是研究药物头孢唑林,另一次是安慰剂)。收集直到出院前以及产后6周时的人口,孕产妇和新生儿监测数据。从每8名新生儿的脐带血中测量预防性抗生素的水平。这项研究的目的是比较剖腹产(CD)在两个不同的时间(在皮肤切开之前和在夹紧脐带之后)对母亲和新生儿的预防性抗生素静脉注射头孢唑啉1?g的作用。随访的次要结果是母婴重新入院的次数。 Fisher的精确检验是一种有意义的检验,用于发现风险变量与结果之间的关联。结果登记的母亲总数为1106名,其中553名母亲在皮肤切口前(切口前)接受了抗生素治疗,543名母亲在脐带夹紧后(切口后)接受了抗生素治疗。与切开后组相比,切开前组的发热性疾病(RR?=?0.48,95%CI:0.29-0.80)和SSI(RR?=?0.14,95%CI:0.04-0.53)明显更少。切口后组的住院时间明显大于切口前组的4-7天(p = 0.005),而在新生儿后的住院时间明显大于7天(p = 0.005)。脐带血中的抗生素含量仅为2-3%。结论切口前预防性抗生素可保护母亲免受SSI和高热疾病的侵害,并显着减少住院时间。试验注册印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)的日期为[CTRI / 2016/03/006710,日期为04/03/2016]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号