首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Systematic review of community participation interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in rural South Asia
【24h】

Systematic review of community participation interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in rural South Asia

机译:对社区参与干预措施的系统评价,以改善南亚农村地区的孕产妇健康状况

获取原文
           

摘要

This is a systematic review on the effectiveness of community interventions in improving maternal health care outcomes in South Asia. We searched electronic databases to June 2017. Randomised or cluster randomised studies in communities within rural/remote areas of Nepal, Bangladesh, India and Pakistan were included. Data were analysed as risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR), and effects were adjusted for clustering. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects and evidence quality was assessed. Eleven randomised trials were included from 5440 citations. Meta-analysis of all community interventions combined compared with control showed a small improvement in the number of women attending at least one antenatal care visit (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33). Two community mobilisation sub groups: home care using both male and female mobilisers, and education by community mobilisers, improved the number of women attending at least one antenatal visit. There was no difference in the number of women attending at least one antenatal visit for any other subgroup. There was no difference in the number of women attending 3 or more antenatal visits for all community interventions combined, or any community subgroup. Likewise, there was no difference in attendance at birth between all community interventions combined and control. Health care facility births were modestly increased in women’s education groups (adjusted RR (1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.20; 2 studies)). Risk of maternal deaths after 2 years (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.64; 5 studies), and 3 years (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.36; 2 studies), were no different between women’s education groups and control. Community level mobilisation rather than health care messages at district level improved the numbers of women giving birth at health care facilities (RR1.09 (95%CI 1.06 to 1.13; 1 study)). Maternal health care knowledge scores improved in two community-based interventions, one involving education of male community members. Women’s education interventions may improve the number of women seeking birth at a health care facility, but the evidence is of low quality. No impact on maternal mortality was observed Future research should explore the effectiveness of including male mobilisers. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO CRD42016033201 .
机译:这是对社区干预措施在改善南亚孕产妇保健结果方面的有效性的系统评价。我们搜索了截至2017年6月的电子数据库。其中包括尼泊尔,孟加拉国,印度和巴基斯坦的农村/边远地区社区的随机或聚类随机研究。分析数据为风险比(RR)或优势比(OR),并针对聚类调整影响。使用随机效应进行荟萃分析,并评估证据质量。从5440篇文献中纳入了11项随机试验。对所有社区干预措施与对照相比的荟萃分析显示,参加至少一次产前检查的妇女人数略有改善(RR 1.19,95%CI 1.06至1.33)。两个社区动员小组:使用男性和女性动员者的家庭护理以及社区动员者的教育提高了至少参加一次产前检查的妇女人数。对于任何其他亚组,至少参加一次产前检查的妇女人数没有差异。参加所有社区干预措施或任何社区亚组的参加3次或更多次产前检查的妇女人数没有差异。同样,所有社区干预措施的合并和控制之间的出勤率也没有差异。在妇女教育组中,医疗机构的出生人数有所增加(调整后的RR(1.15,95%CI 1.11至1.20; 2个研究))。妇女受教育程度与对照组相比,2年(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.24至1.64; 5项研究)和3年(RR 1.11,95%CI 0.52至2.36; 2研究)的孕产妇死亡风险在女性教育组和对照组之间没有差异。社区一级的动员而不是地区一级的保健信息提高了在保健机构分娩的妇女人数(RR1.09(95%CI 1.06至1.13; 1研究))。两项基于社区的干预措施提高了孕产妇保健知识得分,其中一项涉及对男性社区成员的教育。妇女的教育干预措施可能会增加在医疗机构分娩的妇女人数,但证据表明质量低下。未观察到对产妇死亡率的影响未来的研究应探索包括男性动员者的有效性。该系统评价已在PROSPERO CRD42016033201中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号