...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36?weeks gestation-a feasibility study
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36?weeks gestation-a feasibility study

机译:一项随机对照试验,比较妊娠36周后减少或减少胎儿运动的标准或强化治疗-可行性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Women presenting with reduced fetal movements (RFM) in the third trimester are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction. These outcomes after RFM are related to smaller fetal size on ultrasound scan, oligohydramnios and lower human placental lactogen (hPL) in maternal serum. We performed this study to address whether a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the management of RFM was feasible with regard to: i) maternal recruitment and retention ii) patient acceptability, iii) adherence to protocol. Additionally, we aimed to confirm the prevalence of poor perinatal outcomes defined as: stillbirth, birthweight th centile, umbilical arterial pH Methods Women with RFM ≥36?weeks gestation were invited to participate in a RCT comparing standard management (ultrasound scan if indicated, induction of labour (IOL) based on consultant decision) with intensive management (ultrasound scan, maternal serum hPL, IOL if either result was abnormal). Anxiety was assessed by state-trait anxiety index (STAI) before and after investigations for RFM. Rates of protocol compliance and IOL for RFM were calculated. Participant views were assessed by questionnaires. Results 137 women were approached, 120 (88%) participated, 60 in each group, 2 women in the standard group did not complete the study. 20% of participants had a poor perinatal outcome. All women in the intensive group had ultrasound assessment of fetal size and liquor volume vs. 97% in the standard group. 50% of the intensive group had IOL for abnormal scan or low hPL after RFM vs. 26% of controls (p? Conclusion An RCT of management of RFM is feasible with a low rate of attrition. Investigations decrease maternal anxiety. Participants in the intensive group were more likely to have IOL for RFM. Further work is required to determine the likely level of intervention in the standard care arm in multiple centres, to develop additional placental biomarkers and to confirm that the composite outcome is valid. Trial registration ISRCTN07944306
机译:背景技术妊娠晚期胎儿运动(RFM)减少的妇女死产或胎儿生长受限的风险增加。 RFM后的这些结局与超声扫描中较小的胎儿大小,羊水过少和母体血清中人胎盘催乳素(hPL)降低有关。我们进行了这项研究,以探讨RFM管理的随机对照试验(RCT)在以下方面是否可行:i)孕产妇的招募和保留; ii)患者的可接受性; iii)遵守治疗方案。此外,我们旨在确定围产期不良预后的患病率,这些预后定义为:死产,出生体重,百分位数,脐动脉pH方法方法:妊娠RFM≥36周的女性被邀请参加比较标准管理(超声检查)的RCT如果有指示,则采用强化管理(超声扫描,母体血清hPL,IOL,如果两种结果均异常),根据顾问的决定进行引产(IOL)。在调查RFM之前和之后,通过状态特征焦虑指数(STAI)评估焦虑。计算协议遵守率和RFM的IOL。参与者的意见通过问卷进行评估。结果接近137名妇女,120名(88%)参加,每组60名,标准组中2名妇女未完成研究。 20%的参与者围产期结局较差。强化组的所有妇女均接受了胎儿大小和酒量的超声检查,而标准组为97%。强化组中有50%接受RFM后出现异常扫描或低水平hPL的IOL,而对照组则为26%(p?结论结论:进行RFM的RCT管理是可行的,且耗损率低。研究减少了产妇的焦虑感。 ISRCTN07944306,需要进行进一步的工作以确定在多个中心的标准护理部门中可能进行干预的水平,开发其他胎盘生物标志物并确认复合结果是否有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号