...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Patterns in blood pressure medication use in US incident dialysis patients over the first 6?months
【24h】

Patterns in blood pressure medication use in US incident dialysis patients over the first 6?months

机译:前6个月内美国事件透析患者的血压用药方式

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Several observational studies have evaluated the effect of a single exposure window with blood pressure (BP) medications on outcomes in incident dialysis patients, but whether BP medication prescription patterns remain stable or a single exposure window design is adequate to evaluate effect on outcomes is unclear. Methods We described patterns of BP medication prescription over 6?months after dialysis initiation in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients, stratified by cardiovascular comorbidity, diabetes, and other patient characteristics. The cohort included 13,072 adult patients (12,159 hemodialysis, 913 peritoneal dialysis) who initiated dialysis in Dialysis Clinic, Inc., facilities January 1, 2003-June 30, 2008, and remained on the original modality for at least 6?months. We evaluated monthly patterns in BP medication prescription over 6?months and at 12 and 24?months after initiation. Results Prescription patterns varied by dialysis modality over the first 6?months; substantial proportions of patients with prescriptions for beta-blockers, renin angiotensin system agents, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in month 6 no longer had prescriptions for these medications by month 24. Prescription of specific medication classes varied by comorbidity, race/ethnicity, and age, but little by sex. The mean number of medications was 2.5 at month 6 in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis cohorts. Conclusions This study evaluates BP medication patterns in both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients over the first 6?months of dialysis. Our findings highlight the challenges of assessing comparative effectiveness of a single BP medication class in dialysis patients. Longitudinal designs should be used to account for changes in BP medication management over time, and designs that incorporate common combinations should be considered.
机译:背景几项观察性研究评估了血压(BP)药物的单一暴露窗口对事件透析患者结局的影响,但尚不清楚BP药物处方模式是否保持稳定或单一暴露窗口设计是否足以评估对结果的影响。方法我们描述了在血液透析和腹膜透析患者开始透析后6个月内的BP药物处方模式,按心血管合并症,糖尿病和其他患者特征分层。该队列包括2003年1月1日至2008年6月30日在Dialysis Clinic,Inc.设施中开始进行透析的13,072名成年患者(12,159例血液透析,913腹膜透析),并保持原有模式至少6个月。我们评估了开始后6个月以及12个月和24个月时BP药物处方的每月模式。结果在最初的6个月内,透析方式的处方方式各不相同。在第6个月中,有相当比例的患者使用了β受体阻滞剂,肾素血管紧张素系统药和二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂的处方,到24个月时不再使用这些药物的处方。具体的药物类别的处方因合并症,种族/民族和年龄而异,但按性别分列。在血液透析和腹膜透析队列中,第6个月的平均药物数量为2.5。结论本研究评估了透析的前6个月中血液透析和腹膜透析患者的BP药物治疗方式。我们的发现凸显了评估单一BP药物类别在透析患者中​​的相对有效性所面临的挑战。纵向设计应用于解释BP药物管理随时间的变化,并应考虑采用常见组合的设计。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号