首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) through deltoid-pectoralis approach for the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures
【24h】

Minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) through deltoid-pectoralis approach for the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures

机译:三角肌-胸膜入路微创经皮钢板内固定(MIPPO)治疗老年肱骨近端骨折

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Current treatments for proximal humeral fractures include conservative treatment, conventional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and MIPPO through deltoid-splitting approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of MIPPO versus ORIF via the deltoid-pectoralis approach in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures. Methods Thirty-six patients with proximal humeral fractures were enrolled in this study. Following the randomized block and single-blinded principle, the patients were assigned to two groups and treated with either conventional ORIF or MIPPO, both through the deltoid-pectoralis approach. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by the NEER score, Constant-Murley score, blood loss, length of operation, radiological imaging and clinical examination. The patients were followed up for 4–24 (mean 10) months. Results According to Constant-Murley score, the surgical outcome was excellent in 14 cases, satisfactory in 2 cases and unsatisfactory in one case in MIPPO group versus 10, 5 and 4 in conventional ORIF group. MIPPO was significantly advantageous over conventional ORIF in terms of NEER score, Constant-Murley, length of operation and intraoperative blood loss. In addition, MIPPO was also more advantageous in several indexes in patients with BMI?>?26.0 and NEER type III fracture. Conclusion The results?of our study have demonstrated that MIPPO through the deltoid-pectoralis approach is an effective alternative for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Trial registration The trial registration number (TRN): ChiCTR-INR-17011098 (retrospectively registered at 2017-04-09)
机译:背景技术当前的肱骨近端骨折治疗方法包括保守治疗,常规的切开复位内固定术(ORIF)和通过三角肌劈裂术的MIPPO。这项研究的目的是通过三角肌-胸膜入路评估老年肱骨近端骨折患者的MIPPO与ORIF的临床结局。方法纳入36例肱骨近端骨折患者。遵循随机分组和单盲原则,将患者分为两组,分别通过三角胸肌入路接受常规ORIF或MIPPO治疗。通过NEER评分,Constant-Murley评分,失血量,手术时间,影像学检查和临床检查评估手术结果。对患者进行了4-24(平均10)个月的随访。结果根据Constant-Murley评分,MIPPO组14例的手术效果优良,2例满意,1例不满意,而常规ORIF组为10、5和4。在NEER评分,Constant-Murley,手术时间和术中失血方面,MIPPO明显优于常规ORIF。另外,在BMI≥26.0和NEER III型骨折的患者中,MIPPO在多项指标上也更具优势。结论我们的研究结果表明,通过三角肌-胸膜入路的MIPPO是治疗老年患者肱骨近端骨折的有效替代方法。试用注册试用注册号(TRN):ChiCTR-INR-17011098(追溯注册于2017-04-09)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号