首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position
【24h】

Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position

机译:腰椎触诊的可靠性,运动范围和位置确定

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The study purposes were to investigate the level of agreement of palpation of lumbar spinous processes between examiners, test-retest repeatability of lumbar spine range of motion, and the reliability of upright position measures in asymptomatic subjects. Methods The modified CA 6000 spinal motion apparatus with a new skin fixation system was used by three operators for the test-retest spine measurements (3 days apart), and to obtain measures at one session of spinal position. Mean ranges of motion in all planes for 22 asymptomatic subjects were reported using the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient. Results Overall, differences in palpation agreement for lumbar segments occurred in three subjects and did not affect range of motion values. For upright spinal position, ICC (2,3) values for sagittal, coronal, and horizontal plane positions were 0.96, 0.80, and 0.98 respectively. There were statistically significant differences between examiners for position values, determined by the Bonferroni t-test (p Conclusion Results suggest that lumbar spinal motion measurements and position determination between different operators can be consistent particularly if utilizing the modified instrument. Static lumbar position also appears to be recorded reliably between different operators. Results justify progression to multi-center lumbar research using the modified CA 6000 and the work is considered relevant to medical clinicians working with spinal dysfunction, surgical interventions, or occupational health.
机译:背景研究的目的是研究检查者之间的腰椎棘突触诊水平,重测腰椎运动范围的重测重复性以及无症状受试者直立姿势测量的可靠性。方法三名操作员使用经过改良的带有新的皮肤固定系统的CA 6000脊柱运动仪进行脊柱测试(间隔3天),以进行一次脊柱位置的测量。使用类内相关系数报告了22名无症状受试者在所有平面上的平均运动范围。结果总体而言,三位受试者的腰节触诊一致性存在差异,并且不影响运动值范围。对于直立的脊柱位置,矢状,冠状和水平面位置的ICC(2,3)值分别为0.96、0.80和0.98。通过Bonferroni t检验确定的位置值之间,检查者之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p结论结果表明,不同操作者之间的腰椎运动测量和位置确定可以保持一致,特别是如果使用改良的仪器。可以证明使用改良的CA 6000进行多中心腰椎研究的合理性,并且这项工作被认为与从事脊柱功能障碍,外科手术或职业卫生的医学临床医生有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号