首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >A Cost-Consequences analysis of the effect of Pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral Neuropathic Pain in routine medical practice in Primary Care settings
【24h】

A Cost-Consequences analysis of the effect of Pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral Neuropathic Pain in routine medical practice in Primary Care settings

机译:普瑞巴林在基层医疗机构常规医疗实践中对普瑞巴林治疗周围神经性疼痛的疗效的成本后果分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a common symptom of a group of a variety of conditions, including diabetic neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, or postherpetic neuralgia. Prevalence of NeP has been estimated to range between 5-7.5%, and produces up to 25% of pain clinics consultations. Due to its severity, chronic evolution, and associated co-morbidities, NeP has an important individual and social impact. The objective was to analyze the effect of pregabalin (PGB) on pain alleviation and longitudinal health and non-health resources utilization and derived costs in peripheral refractory NeP in routine medical practice in primary care settings (PCS) in Spain. Methods Subjects from PCS were older than 18 years, with peripheral NeP (diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia or trigeminal neuralgia), refractory to at least one previous analgesic, and included in a prospective, real world, and 12-week two-visit cost-of-illness study. Measurement of resources utilization included both direct healthcare and indirect expenditures. Pain severity was measured by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Results One-thousand-three-hundred-fifty-four PGB-naive patients [58.8% women, 59.5 (12.7) years old] were found eligible for this secondary analysis: 598 (44%) switched from previous therapy to PGB given in monotherapy (PGBm), 589 (44%) received PGB as add-on therapy (PGB add-on), and 167 (12%) patients changed previous treatments to others different than PGB (non-PGB). Reductions of pain severity were higher in both PGBm and PGB add-on groups (54% and 51%, respectively) than in non-PGB group (34%), p Conclusion In Spanish primary care settings, PGB given either add-on or in monotherapy in routine medical practice was associated with pain alleviation leading to significant longitudinal reductions in resource use and total costs during the 12-week period of the study compared with non-PGB-therapy of patients with chronic NeP of peripheral origin. The use of non-appropriate analgesic therapies for neuropathic pain in a portion of subjects in non-PGB group could explain partially such findings.
机译:背景技术神经性疼痛(NeP)是一组多种疾病的常见症状,包括糖尿病性神经病,三叉神经痛或带状疱疹后遗神经痛。据估计,NeP的患病率介于5-7.5%之间,最多可引起25%的疼痛诊所咨询。由于其严重性,慢性发展以及相关的合并症,NeP具有重要的个人和社会影响。目的是分析普瑞巴林(PGB)在西班牙初级保健机构(PCS)的常规医疗实践中对缓解疼痛和纵向健康及非健康资源的利用以及外周难治性NeP产生的成本的影响。方法来自PCS的受试者年龄超过18岁,患有周围性NeP(糖尿病性神经病,疱疹后神经痛或三叉神经痛),至少对一种以前的镇痛剂无效,并且包括在前瞻性,真实世界和12周两次访视中疾病成本研究。资源利用的衡量包括直接医疗保健和间接支出。疼痛严重程度通过简短的McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)进行测量。结果发现有134例初次使用PGB的患者[58.8%的女性,59.5(12.7)岁]有资格进行该次要分析:598(44%)从既往治疗改为单一治疗中的PGB (PGBm),589(44%)名患者接受了PGB附加治疗(PGB附加治疗),还有167名(12%)患者将以前的治疗改为其他不同于PGB的治疗(非PGB)。 PGBm和PGB附加组的疼痛严重程度均高于非PGB组(分别为54%和51%),p结论结论在西班牙初级保健机构中,PGB给予附加或附加与非PGB疗法治疗外周源性慢性NeP的患者相比,常规医疗实践中的单药疗法与缓解疼痛有关,从而在研究的12周期间显着纵向减少了资源使用和总成本。在非PGB组的部分受试者中,使用不恰当的镇痛疗法治疗神经性疼痛可部分解释此类发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号