首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome
【24h】

Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome

机译:多轴锁定钢板治疗肱骨远端骨折:临床结果的比较随机试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Management of distal humeral fractures remains to be one of the most challenging aspects in trauma surgery. Low profile plating systems with variable angle screw fixation represent a crucial advancement to the established angular stable locking plates with considerable attention in current research. The aim of the prospective randomized trial was to review the preliminary results and patients’ outcome following treatment with these newly developed implants and to rule out potential differences in fracture treatment of two different plating systems. Twenty patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 – AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes? VA-LCP vs. Medartis? Aptus Elbow). Functional elbow scoring (ROM, MEPS, QuickDASH) served as primary outcome parameter, while radiological fracture consolidation served as secondary outcome parameter. Follow-ups were conducted 6?weeks, 12?weeks, 6?months and 12?months after the operation. Seventeen of 20 patients (85%) concluded all follow-up examinations. Postoperative elbow extension deficiencies showed significant differences between the two groups in all follow-up examinations with a mean of ? 18 +/? 7.4 degrees in the DePuy Synthes? VA-LCP group compared to a mean of ? 6.5 +/? 7.5 degrees in the Medartis? Aptus Elbow group (p?=?0.002) 12?months postoperatively. Functional scoring showed a disparate pattern. The Medartis? Aptus Elbow group achieved significantly better MEP scores during follow-up. However, the analysis of the QuickDash revealed better results of the DePuy Synthes? VA-LCP group in the first half and better results of the Medartis? Aptus Elbow group in the second half of the follow-up examination instead. Considering the complexity of distal humeral fractures, the usage of anatomically preshaped low profile variable angle locking plates for operative treatment leads to good clinical results. Even though there might be some advances of the Medartis? Aptus Elbow plating system concerning postoperative ROM and elbow function, a consistent difference in the overall clinical outcome between the two plating systems could not be detected. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03272490 Retrospectively Registered 1. September 2017.
机译:肱骨远端骨折的治疗仍然是创伤外科手术中最具挑战性的方面之一。具有可变角度螺钉固定的薄型电镀系统代表了已建立的角度稳定锁定板的关键进展,并在当前研究中引起了广泛关注。这项前瞻性随机试验的目的是回顾这些新开发的植入物治疗后的初步结果和患者的预后,并排除两种不同钢板系统在骨折治疗方面的潜在差异。自2014年以来,本研究共纳入20例肱骨远端骨折(AO 13-A1 – AO 13-C3)患者。在完成随机分配计划后,将患者分为两组,分别使用不同的可变角度锁定板(DePuy Synthes?VA- LCP与Medartis?Aptus手肘)。功能性肘关节评分(ROM,MEPS,QuickDASH)是主要的预后参数,而放射学骨折合并则是次要的预后参数。术后6周,12周,6个月和12个月进行随访。 20名患者中有17名(85%)结束了所有随访检查。术后肘伸不足在所有后续检查中显示两组之间的显着差异,平均值为? 18 + /?在DePuy Synthes中为7.4度? VA-LCP组的平均值为? 6.5 + /?在Medartis的7.5度?术后12个月,Aptus肘组(p?=?0.002)。功能评分显示了完全不同的模式。 Medartis? Aptus Elbow组在随访期间的MEP得分明显提高。但是,对QuickDash的分析显示出DePuy Synthes的更好结果? VA-LCP组在上半年的Medartis效果更好? Aptus肘关节组在下半年的随访检查中代替。考虑到肱骨远端骨折的复杂性,将解剖学预成形的低轮廓可变角度锁定板用于手术治疗可带来良好的临床效果。即使Medartis可能有所进步? Aptus肘部电镀系统涉及术后ROM和肘部功能,无法检测到两种电镀系统在整体临床结果方面的一致差异。 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03272490追溯注册于2017年9月1日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号