首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol
【24h】

The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol

机译:SNAP试验:氮化硅与PEEK笼在有症状退行性腰椎间盘突出症患者经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中的双盲多中心随机对照试验:

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders, and show good clinical results. Still, complications such as subsidence and migration of the cage are frequently seen. A lack of osteointegration and fibrous tissues surrounding PEEK cages are held responsible. Ceramic implants made of silicon nitride show better biocompatible and osteoconductive qualities, and therefore are expected to lower complication rates and allow for better fusion. Purpose of this study is to show that fusion with the silicon nitride cage produces non-inferior results in outcome of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at all follow-up time points as compared to the same procedure with PEEK cages. Methods/Design This study is designed as a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial with repeated measures analysis. 100 patients (18–75 years) presenting with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disorders unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatment are included. Patients will be randomly assigned to a PEEK cage or a silicon nitride cage, and will undergo a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Primary outcome measure is the functional improvement measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcome parameters are the VAS leg, VAS back, SF-36, Likert scale, neurological outcome and radiographic assessment of fusion. After 1 year the fusion rate will be measured by radiograms and CT. Follow-up will be continued for 2 years. Patients and clinical observers who will perform the follow-up visits will be blinded for type of cage used during follow-up. Analyses of radiograms and CT will be performed independently by two experienced radiologists. Discussion In this study a PEEK cage will be compared with a silicon nitride cage in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial in which the silicon nitride cage is compared with the PEEK cage in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. Trial registration NCT01557829
机译:背景技术聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼已被广泛用于治疗腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病,并显示出良好的临床效果。但是,经常会出现诸如下陷和笼子迁移等并发症。 PEEK笼周围缺乏骨整合和纤维组织,这是造成这种情况的原因。由氮化硅制成的陶瓷植入物表现出更好的生物相容性和骨传导性,因此有望降低并发症发生率并实现更好的融合。这项研究的目的是要表明,与使用PEEK笼子进行的相同手术相比,与所有氮化硅笼子进行融合在所有后续时间点上对Roland Morris残疾问卷的结果均不逊色。方法/设计本研究设计为双盲多中心随机对照试验,并进行了重复措施分析。包括100例(18-75岁)出现症状性腰椎退行性疾病的患者,这些患者对至少6个月的保守治疗无反应。患者将被随机分配到PEEK笼或氮化硅笼中,并接受椎弓根螺钉固定椎间孔椎间融合术。主要结局指标是由Roland Morris残疾问卷调查得出的功能改善情况。次要结果参数是VAS腿,VAS背部,SF-36,李克特量表,神经系统结果和融合的放射学评估。一年后,融合率将通过射线照相和CT测量。随访将持续2年。进行随访的患者和临床观察员将不了解随访期间使用的笼子类型。放射线图和CT的分析将由两名经验丰富的放射科医生独立进行。讨论在本研究中,将PEEK笼与氮化硅笼进行比较,以治疗有症状的退行性腰椎间盘突出症。据我们所知,这是第一项随机对照试验,其中将有症状的退行性腰椎间盘疾病患者的氮化硅笼与PEEK笼进行了比较。试用注册NCT01557829

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号