...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Medication adherence in randomized controlled trials evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients: A systematic review
【24h】

Medication adherence in randomized controlled trials evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients: A systematic review

机译:评估透析患者心血管或死亡率结果的随机对照试验中的药物依从性:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Medication non-adherence is common among renal dialysis patients. High degrees of non-adherence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can lead to failure to detect a true treatment effect. Cardio-protective pharmacological interventions have shown no consistent benefit in RCTs involving dialysis patients. Whether non-adherence contributes to this lack of efficacy is unknown. We aimed to investigate how medication adherence and drug discontinuation were assessed, reported and addressed in RCTs, evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients. Methods Electronic database searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE & Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs published between 2005–2015, evaluating self-administered medications, in adult dialysis patients, which reported clinical cardiovascular or mortality endpoints, as primary or secondary outcomes. Study characteristics, outcomes, methods of measuring and reporting adherence, and data on study drug discontinuation were analyzed. Results Of the 642 RCTs in dialysis patients, 22 trials (12 placebo controlled), which included 19,322 patients, were eligible. The trialed pharmacological interventions included anti-hypertensives, phosphate binders, lipid-lowering therapy, cardio-vascular medications, homocysteine lowering therapy, fish oil and calcimimetics. Medication adherence was reported in five trials with a mean of 81% (range: 65–92%) in the intervention arm and 84.5% (range: 82–87%) in the control arm. All the trials that reported adherence yielded negative study outcomes for the intervention. Study-drug discontinuation was reported in 21 trials (mean 33.2%; 95% CI, 22.0 to 44.5, in intervention and 28.8%; 95% CI, 16.8 to 40.8, in control). Trials with more than 20% study drug discontinuation, more often yielded negative study outcomes ( p =?0.018). Non-adherence was included as a contributor to drug discontinuation in some studies, but the causes of discontinuation were not reported consistently between studies, and non-adherence was listed under different categories, thereby potentiating the misclassification of adherence. Conclusions Reporting of medication adherence and study-drug discontinuation in RCTs investigating cardiovascular or mortality endpoints in dialysis patients are inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies and evaluate their impact on outcomes. Recommendations for consistent reporting of non-adherence and causes of drug discontinuation in RCTs will therefore help to assess their impact on clinical outcomes.
机译:背景药物不依从在肾透析患者中​​很常见。随机对照试验(RCT)中高度的不依从性可能导致无法检测出真正的治疗效果。在涉及透析患者的RCT中,心脏保护性药理干预措施未显示出持续的获益。不坚持是否会导致这种功效缺乏尚不清楚。我们旨在研究如何在RCT中评估,报告和解决药物依从性和停药的情况,评估透析患者的心血管或死亡率结果。方法在MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL中进行了2005-2015年间发布的RCT的电子数据库搜索,评估了成人透析患者的自用药物,这些患者报告了临床心血管或死亡终点,作为主要或次要结果。分析研究特征,结果,测量和报告依从性的方法以及研究药物停药的数据。结果透析患者的642例RCT中,有22项试验(12项安慰剂对照)包括19,322例患者符合条件。试验的药物干预措施包括抗高血压药,磷酸盐结合剂,降脂疗法,心血管药物,高半胱氨酸降低疗法,鱼油和拟钙剂。在五项试验中报告了药物依从性,干预组平均为81%(范围:65–92%),对照组平均为84.5%(范围:82–87%)。所有报告依从性的试验均对干预产生负面的研究结果。在21个试验中报告了研究药物的停用(平均干预率为33.2%; 95%CI为22.0至44.5,对照组为28.8%; 95%CI为16.8至40.8)。研究药物中止率超过20%的试验更常产生阴性研究结果(p =?0.018)。在某些研究中,将不依从性作为药物停药的原因之一,但是在研究之间并没有一致地报告停药的原因,并且将不依从性列为不同类别,从而加剧了依从性的错误分类。结论在RCT中研究透析患者心血管或死亡终点的药物依从性和研究药物停药的报道不一致,因此难以进行比较研究和评估其对结局的影响。因此,关于连续报告RCT中不依从性和药物停用原因的建议将有助于评估其对临床结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号