首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: the logic of logic models
【24h】

Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: the logic of logic models

机译:在医疗保健研究中推进复杂性科学:逻辑模型的逻辑

获取原文
           

摘要

Logic models are commonly used in evaluations to represent the causal processes through which interventions produce outcomes, yet significant debate is currently taking place over whether they can describe complex interventions which adapt to context. This paper assesses the logic models used in healthcare research from a complexity perspective. A typology of existing logic models is proposed, as well as a formal methodology for deriving more flexible and dynamic logic models. Various logic model types were tested as part of an evaluation of a complex Patient Experience Toolkit (PET) intervention, developed and implemented through action research across six hospital wards/departments in the English NHS. Three dominant types of logic model were identified, each with certain strengths but ultimately unable to accurately capture the dynamics of PET. Hence, a fourth logic model type was developed to express how success hinges on the adaption of PET to its delivery settings. Aspects of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) model were incorporated into a traditional logic model structure to create a dynamic “type 4” logic model that can accommodate complex interventions taking on a different form in different settings. Logic models can be used to model complex interventions that adapt to context but more flexible and dynamic models are required. An implication of this is that how logic models are used in healthcare research may have to change. Using logic models to forge consensus among stakeholders and/or provide precise guidance across different settings will be inappropriate in the case of complex interventions that adapt to context. Instead, logic models for complex interventions may be targeted at facilitators to enable them to prospectively assess the settings they will be working in and to develop context-sensitive facilitation strategies. Researchers should be clear as to why they are using a logic model and experiment with different models to ensure they have the correct type.
机译:逻辑模型通常用于评估中,以表示干预产生结果的因果过程,然而,关于是否可以描述适应情境的复杂干预,目前仍在进行大量辩论。本文从复杂性的角度评估了医疗研究中使用的逻辑模型。提出了现有逻辑模型的类型学,以及用于推导更灵活和动态逻辑模型的正式方法。作为对复杂的患者体验工具包(PET)干预的评估的一部分,测试了各种逻辑模型类型,这些语言模型是通过英语NHS中六个医院病房/部门的行动研究开发和实施的。确定了三种主要的逻辑模型类型,每种都有一定的优势,但最终无法准确地捕获PET的动力学。因此,开发了第四种逻辑模型类型来表达成功如何取决于PET适应其交付设置。将卫生服务研究实施促进行动(PARIHS)模型的各个方面纳入传统的逻辑模型结构中,以创建动态的“ 4类”逻辑模型,该模型可以适应在不同环境下采取不同形式的复杂干预措施。逻辑模型可用于对适应环境的复杂干预进行建模,但需要更加灵活和动态的模型。这意味着在医疗保健研究中如何使用逻辑模型可能需要改变。在采用复杂的干预措施以适应具体情况的情况下,使用逻辑模型在利益相关者之间达成共识和/或在不同环境下提供精确的指导将是不合适的。取而代之的是,针对复杂干预措施的逻辑模型可以针对促进者,以使他们能够前瞻性地评估他们将要工作的环境并制定与情境相关的促进策略。研究人员应该清楚他们为什么使用逻辑模型并尝试使用不同的模型以确保其类型正确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号