...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) – a mixed method feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) – a mixed method feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial

机译:慢性头痛教育和自我管理研究(CHESS)–混合方法可行性研究,旨在为随机对照试验的设计提供信息

获取原文

摘要

Self-management support programmes are effective in a range of chronic conditions however there is limited evidence for their use in the treatment of chronic headaches. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of four key aspects of a planned, future evaluative trial of a new education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache: 1) recruiting people with chronic headache from primary care; 2) a telephone interview for the classification of chronic headaches; 3) the education and self-management intervention itself; and 4) the most appropriate patient reported outcomes (PROMS). Participants were identified and recruited from general practices in the West Midlands of the UK. We developed a nurse-led chronic headache classification interview and assessed agreement with an interview with headache specialists. We developed and tested a group based education and self-management intervention to assess training and delivery receipt using observation, facilitator, and participant feedback. We explored the acceptability and relevance of PROMs using postal questionnaires, interviews and a smartphone app. Fourteen practices took part in the study and participant recruitment equated to 1.0/1000 registered patients. Challenges to recruitment were identified. We did 107 paired headache classification interviews. The level of agreement between nurse and doctor interviews was very good. We piloted the intervention in four groups with 18 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators helped refine the intervention including shortening the overall intervention and increasing the facilitator training time. Participants completed 131 baseline questionnaires, measurement data quality, reliability and validity for headache-specific and generic measures was acceptable. This study indicated that recruiting people with chronic headache from primary care is feasible but challenging, our headache classification interview is fit for purpose, our study intervention is viable, and that our choice of outcome measures is acceptable to participants in a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).
机译:自我管理支持计划在一系列慢性病中均有效,但是,用于治疗慢性头痛的证据有限。这项研究的目的是测试一项针对慢性头痛患者的新的教育和自我管理干预措施的计划,未来评估试验的四个关键方面的可行性:1)从初级保健机构招募慢性头痛患者; 2)电话采访慢性头痛的分类; 3)教育和自我管理干预本身; 4)最合适的患者报告结局(PROMS)。确定了参与者并从英国西米德兰兹郡的常规实践中招募了参与者。我们开发了由护士领导的慢性头痛分类访谈,并通过与头痛专家的访谈评估了同意性。我们开发并测试了基于小组的教育和自我管理干预措施,以使用观察,促进者和参与者反馈来评估培训和交付收据。我们使用邮政调查表,访谈和智能手机应用程序探索了PROM的可接受性和相关性。参加研究的有14种方法,招募参与者相当于1.0 / 1000名注册患者。确定了招聘方面的挑战。我们进行了107次配对的头痛分类访谈。护士和医生访谈之间的协议水平非常好。我们在18名参与者的四个小组中进行了干预试验。参与者和主持人的定性反馈有助于改进干预措施,包括缩短总体干预时间并增加主持人培训时间。参加者完成了131份基线问卷,对于头痛特定和一般性测量,测量数据的质量,信度和效度是可以接受的。这项研究表明,从基层医疗机构招募患有慢性头痛的人是可行的,但具有挑战性,我们的头痛分类访谈是有针对性的,我们的研究干预措施是可行的,并且在以后的随机对照试验中参与者可以接受我们选择的结局指标( RCT)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号